Users Online: 356
Home Print this page Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Ahead of Print Instructions Subscribe Contacts Special issues Login 


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
CASE REPORT
Adv Biomed Res 2017,  6:101

Coexistence of Multiple Sclerosis and Brain Tumor: An Uncommon Diagnostic Challenge


Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Web Publication14-Aug-2017

Correspondence Address:
Fariborz Khorvash
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_625_13

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Nonneoplastic demyelinating processes of the brain with mass effect on magnetic resonance imaging can cause diagnostic difficulties. It requires differential diagnosis between the tumefactive demyelinating lesion and the coexistence of neoplasm. We document the case of 41-year-old woman with clinical and radiological findings suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Additional investigations confirmed the coexistence of astrocytoma. This report emphasizes the importance of considering brain tumors in the differential diagnosis of primary demyelinating disease presenting with a cerebral mass lesion.

Keywords: Astrocytoma, brain tumor, multiple sclerosis


How to cite this article:
Abrishamchi F, Khorvash F. Coexistence of Multiple Sclerosis and Brain Tumor: An Uncommon Diagnostic Challenge. Adv Biomed Res 2017;6:101

How to cite this URL:
Abrishamchi F, Khorvash F. Coexistence of Multiple Sclerosis and Brain Tumor: An Uncommon Diagnostic Challenge. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2023 Mar 23];6:101. Available from: https://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2017/6/1/101/212929


  Introduction Top


Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease characterized by heterogeneity in clinical symptoms and for that reason may simulate or masquerade other central nervous system (CNS) diseases.[1],[2] Primary demyelinating disease of CNS generally does not produce a focal diffuse mass lesion, a feature that has been used to distinguish demyelinating lesions from the tumor.[3] MS plaques on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generally appear as multiple, well-demarcated, homogenous, small ovoid lesions, lacking mass effect, and often oriented perpendicular to the long axis of the lateral ventricles.[4] However, patients with MS may develop space-occupying lesions that may be mistaken as neoplasia, and this form of MS is eventually called tumefactive MS.[5] The occurrence of tumor-like demyelination is reported rare and more commonly occurs in women and young adults, which causes a diagnostic enigma for both clinicians and radiologists.[5],[6],[7] On the other hand, neoplasia may simulate MS at its initial presentation.[8] Moreover, though uncommon, there might be a coincidence of MS and a CNS neoplasm in the same patient.[9],[10],[11],[12]

We report a case of a patient with a coexistence of MS and astrocytoma.


  Case Report Top


A 41-year-old right-handed woman who had complained of a 3-year history of progressive ataxia and dizziness was visited by a neurologist. Throughout these years, she was visited several times by general physicians. She had a history of falling along with ataxia, and no blurring of vision was noted. Neurological examination revealed no cranial nerve deficit. MRI demonstrated high-signal lesions in the left frontal lobe involving corpus callosum on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging [Figure 1].
Figure 1: High-signal lesions in the left frontal lobe involving corpus callosum on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging

Click here to view


After that, with a diagnosis of MS, according to McDonald criteria (2005) the patient was treated by β-interferon 1a for about 1 year. She had been complained of nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and drowsiness as side effects of β-interferon 1a during therapy. The ataxia, as chief compliant was also continued. After 1 year and with the stress of her husband death, she presented with slowing and clumsiness in a way that she could not walk without help more than 50 m. Neurological examination revealed impaired tandem gate, positive Romberg sign, and positive bilateral Babinsky. New MRI showed that the lesion is extended to left frontoparietal lobe [Figure 2].
Figure 2: High-signal lesions in the left frontoparietal lobe involving corpus callosum on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging

Click here to view


Although brain tumor was suspected, the patient treated with β-interferon 1a for more six months until a magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was done and a commission of neurologists and neurosurgeons suggested astrocytoma and suspected MS for the patient.

Finally, a neurosurgeon did stereotaxis, and pathology revealed Grade II astrocytoma. With this diagnosis the tumor excited by craniotomy and followed by 1 month of radiotherapy. After that, ataxia and clumsiness reduced but she was not visited by neurologist and received no therapy for MS for 6 months. After that following a severe cold, she presented with difficulty in walking and slowing in a way that could not walk without help more than 10 m. Hence with a diagnosis of relapse of MS she received pulse therapy of corticosteroid for 5 days, twice in 2 weeks and followed by Extavia (β-interferon) for 2 months. With therapy walking ability improved and she could walk about 100 m without help.

During follow-up, neurological examination revealed impaired tandem gate, positive Romberg sign, and positive bilateral Babinsky. Cranial nerves were intact, but quadriparesis (more severe in right side), and clumsiness was present. Last MRI showed multiple high-signal plaques around the corpus callosum and high-signal lesion in left parasagital area due to excision of the tumor [Figure 3].
Figure 3: High-signal plaques around the corpus callosum and high-signal lesion in left parasagittal area in T2-weighted imaging

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


MS is usually diagnosed by demonstrating clinical and/or radiographic evidence of dissemination of disease in time and space.[13] Although the usual appearance of MS is that of multiple, small, demyelinating plaques, in some cases, it can simulate a mass lesion, which it would be hard to distinguish from a brain tumor.[14] One series of MS patients who underwent autopsy showed that 6% of cases diagnosed as MS were, in fact, cases with other diagnosis, including a small number of CNS primary neoplasms (0.57%).[11] The most common neoplasm mistaken for MS is CNS lymphoma. MRI findings of glioma may also look similar to those of MS with T2-hyperintense lesions in the cerebral white matter extending into corpus callosum and variable gadolinium enhancement.[3] However, as in our case, low-grade astrocytomas may be sometimes a difficult diagnosis based only on neuroimaging techniques and may be only established by biopsy or radical removal.[11],[15] On the other hand, MS may present as a mass lesion and brain biopsy is generally necessary to confirm the diagnosis.[5] MRS has shown to be a helpful tool in differentiating astrocytic tumors from demyelinating lesions.[12] Reduction of N-acetylaspartate and increase in choline may resemble those of brain tumors and acute MS plaques.[12],[14],[16] The chronic demyelinating plaque, however, shows a completely different pattern.[15] A stereotactic biopsy and histologic examination of the lesion is the final diagnostic approach in equivocal cases.[14] It is safe and reliable, especially if specimens from multiple sites within the lesion are targeted. It has a diagnostic accuracy of 82–99%.[17] In our case, MRS suggested brain tumor and stereotactic biopsy endorsed the diagnosis. Butteriss et al. also reported a case of oligodendroglioma in MS that was diagnosed by surgical removal of the lesion, but that had been considered to be tumefactive MS on preoperative MRI.[12]

The occasional development of gliomas in cases of MS is now an established fact, but the number of reported cases is still small. In our case as previous cases, the sequence of tumor occurring in the context of longstanding MS went unrecognized.[12] These reports emphasize the importance of considering brain tumors in the differential diagnosis of primary demyelinating disease presenting with a cerebral mass lesion.


  Conclusion Top


This scenario will suggest that when we are dealing with a patient with atypical clinical and MRI presentation suggesting MS or brain tumor, and there is an obstacle for brain biopsy: A short course of steroid therapy and follow-up, including imaging, may play a role in clarifying the diagnosis and leading to correct root of therapy. When there is no improvement with steroid therapy or extensions of the single lesion in MRI, other diagnosis such as brain tumor should be ruled out as soon as possible. In the other hand, when brain tumor coexists with MS, after managing the tumor, continuing of correct therapy for MS and following up for possible relapses is very important.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study is funded by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Kaeser MA, Scali F, Lanzisera FP, Bub GA, Kettner NW. Tumefactive multiple sclerosis: An uncommon diagnostic challenge. J Chiropr Med 2011;10:29-35.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Peterson JW, Trapp BD. Neuropathobiology of multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin 2005;23:107-29, vi-vii.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Al-Bunyan MA. Tumor-like presentation of multiple sclerosis. Saudi Med J 2000;21:393-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Barkhof F, Rocca M, Francis G, Van Waesberghe JH, Uitdehaag BM, Hommes OR, et al. Validation of diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis and response to interferon beta1a. Ann Neurol 2003;53:718-24.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Masdeu JC, Quinto C, Olivera C, Tenner M, Leslie D, Visintainer P. Open-ring imaging sign: Highly specific for atypical brain demyelination. Neurology 2000;54:1427-33.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Dagher AP, Smirniotopoulos J. Tumefactive demyelinating lesions. Neuroradiology 1996;38:560-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kalanie H, Harandi AA, Bakhshandehpour R, Heidari D. Multiple large tumefactive MS plaques in a young man: A diagnostic enigma and therapeutic challenge. Case Rep Radiol 2012;2012:363705.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Maranhão-Filho PA, Moraes Filho L, Camara LS, Salema CC. Fulminant form of multiple sclerosis simulating brain tumor: A case with parkinsonian features and pathologic study. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1995;53:503-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Shuangshoti S, Hjardermaal GM, Ahmad Y, Arden JL, Herman MM. Concurrence of multiple sclerosis and intracranial glioma. Report of a case and review of the literature. Clin Neuropathol 2003;22:304-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Acqui M, Caroli E, Di Stefano D, Ferrante L. Cerebral ependymoma in a patient with multiple sclerosis case report and critical review of the literature. Surg Neurol 2008;70:414-20.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Werneck LC, Scola RH, Arruda WO, Torres LF. Glioma and multiple sclerosis: Case report. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2002;60:469-74.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Butteriss DJ, Ismail A, Ellison DW, Birchall D. Use of serial proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to differentiate low grade glioma from tumefactive plaque in a patient with multiple sclerosis. Br J Radiol 2003;76:662-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Malhotra HS, Jain KK, Agarwal A, Singh MK, Yadav SK, Husain M, et al. Characterization of tumefactive demyelinating lesions using MR imaging and in-vivo proton MR spectroscopy. Mult Scler 2009;15:193-203.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Xia L, Lin S, Wang ZC, Li SW, Xu L, Wu J, et al. Tumefactive demyelinating lesions: Nine cases and a review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 2009;32:171-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Enzinger C, Strasser-Fuchs S, Ropele S, Kapeller P, Kleinert R, Fazekas F. Tumefactive demyelinating lesions: Conventional and advanced magnetic resonance imaging. Mult Scler 2005;11:135-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Boviatsis EJ, Kouyialis AT, Stranjalis G, Korfias S, Sakas DE. CT-guided stereotactic biopsies of brain stem lesions: Personal experience and literature review. Neurol Sci 2003;24:97-102.  Back to cited text no. 17
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Diagnostic Dilemma: An Atypical Case of Astrocytoma in a Patient with Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Chantal Kahovec,Aman Saini,Michael C. Levin
Neurology International. 2021; 13(2): 240
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Spinal meningioma in a patient with multiple sclerosis
Sricharan Gopakumar,Marc Daou,Ron Gadot,Alexander E. Ropper,Jacob Mandel
Surgical Neurology International. 2020; 11: 196
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Coexistence of multiple sclerosis and brain tumors: a literature review.
A. H. Sirko,L. A. Dzyak,E. V. Chekha
Medicni perspektivi (Medical perspectives). 2020; 25(2): 30
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Coexistence of multiple sclerosis and brain tumours: case report and review
Andrii Sirko,Lyudmila Dzyak,Ekaterina Chekha,Tetiana Malysheva,Dmytro Romanukha
Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery. 2019; : 100585
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Multiple Sclerosis and the Choroid Plexus: Emerging Concepts of Disease Immunopathophysiology
Grant A. Dixon,Carlos A. Pérez
Pediatric Neurology. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 A challenging case of concurrent multiple sclerosis and anaplastic astrocytoma
Georges Sinclair,Yahya Al-saffar,Philippa Johnstone,Mustafa Aziz Hatiboglu,Alia Shamikh
Surgical Neurology International. 2019; 10: 166
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2516    
    Printed67    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded228    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 6    

Recommend this journal