Users Online: 683
Home Print this page Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Ahead of Print Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Adv Biomed Res 2021,  10:31

Effect of zirconia silica nanofibers on flexural strength of feldspathic ceramic - An experimental study


Department of Prosthodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission04-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance03-Apr-2021
Date of Web Publication27-Oct-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ahila Singaravel Chidambaranathan
Department of Prosthodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai - 600 089, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_132_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Dental ceramics exhibit good optical and esthetic properties due to their translucency. Feldspathic ceramic is the most widely used veneering ceramic with brittleness, which accounts for most of its failure. Hence, this study was done to evaluate and compare the flexural strength of feldspathic ceramic reinforced with zirconia-silica nanofibers in the ratio of 2.5, 5, and 7.5 wt% with conventional feldspathic ceramic. Materials and Methods: According to ISO 6872, a master die was prepared from which resin bars were fabricated with 4.0 mm in width × 1.2 mm thickness × 25.0 mm length, Zirconia-silica nanofibers were produced by sol-gel electrospinning go around with calcination and blended with feldspathic ceramic through ball milling method. The samples were prepared with 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5 wt% nanofibers reinforced ceramic. The flexural strength of the samples was evaluated using three-point bending test. Results: The flexural strength values of zirconia-silica nanofibers reinforced ceramic groups were higher than control group. There was a gradual increase in the flexural strength values of felspathic ceramic groups with increase in wt% of nanofibers. Conclusion: The flexural strength of feldspathic ceramic samples reinforced with zirconia-silica nanofibers by 5 and 7.5 wt% were statistically significant compared to control, whereas the flexural strength of 2.5 wt% was statistically insignificant compared to the control group.

Keywords: Ceramics, dental esthetic, flexural strength, nanofibers, zirconium


How to cite this article:
Tah R, Chidambaranathan AS, Balasubramanium MK, Sundaram SM. Effect of zirconia silica nanofibers on flexural strength of feldspathic ceramic - An experimental study. Adv Biomed Res 2021;10:31

How to cite this URL:
Tah R, Chidambaranathan AS, Balasubramanium MK, Sundaram SM. Effect of zirconia silica nanofibers on flexural strength of feldspathic ceramic - An experimental study. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 6];10:31. Available from: https://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2021/10/1/31/329167




  Introduction Top


Dental ceramics are nonmetallic, inorganic material mainly consists of oxygen with one or more metallic or semimetallic elements. They are composed of three-dimensional network of covalent bonds between the silica tetrahedra.[1] They exhibit chemical, mechanical, physical, and thermal properties that distinguish them from other materials such as metals and resins.

Ceramic is a brittle material that leads to its failure. The latest researches in materials and fabrication methods made the ceramics withstand disruptive stresses such as compressive and shear stresses. Nanotechnology integrated into dentistry enables a new stream of development such as nanoparticles, nanofibers, nanotubes, and nanofilaments into the material part of dental science. Nanofibers are fibers with diameter ≤100 nm.[2]

Recently, zirconia and zirconia-silica nanofibers have been used as reinforcement material for dental composites in restorative dentistry without any adverse effects. The mechanical properties of composite resin have been enhanced by the incorporation of other materials with ceramic.[3],[4] Hence, this study was done with the objective of evaluate and compare the flexural strength of feldspathic ceramic reinforced with zirconia-silica nanofibers at 2.5, 5, 7.5 wt%. A hypothesis was formulated that the flexural strength of feldspathic ceramic would be such as the zirconia-silica nanofibers reinforced ceramic.


  Materials and Methods Top


An experimental study was done in the laboratory for which a master die was prepared according to ISO 6872 with the dimensions of 4.0 mm width × 1.2 mm thickness × 25.0 mm length, it was duplicated in addition silicone impression material (Aquasil, Dentsply, Germany) in putty consistency to get a mold space and auto-polymerizing PMMA resin (DPI Cold cure, Mumbai, India) was used to fabricate the resin bars. The samples were grouped as Group A (control), Group A1, Group A2, and Group A3 based on incorporation of zirconia-silica nanofibers by 0, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 wt%, respectively. A total of twenty samples were prepared.

Distilled water was added to ceramic (IPS Classic V Dentin Body, Ivoclair) and condensed with piston of a syringe and blotting paper. It was carefully detached from the syringe tube and sintered at 900 degree centigrade to produce feldspathic ceramic pellets. A sprue was fixed with the resin bar and invested in phosphate bonded investment (IPS Press Vest Speed, BEGO, Germany) then burnout was done. The preformed feldspathic ceramic blocks were melted and ejected into the mold space under pressure and high temperature.

Zirconia-silica nanofibers were prepared using sol-gel electrospinning (ESPIN-NANO, PECO, Chennai) method. Zirconia-silica nanofibers were incorporated into feldspathic ceramic in the ratio of 2.5%, 5.0%, and 7.5% by weight. The blending of nanofibers to feldspathic was done through ball milling, then mixed with distilled water separately, then condensed and sintered at 90°C to produce ceramic pellets. The pellets were condensed under pressure at high temperature into the mold space and subjected to sintering.

The flexural strength was investigated using three-point bending test in an UTM (Autograph universal testing machine, Shimadzu corp, Japan) at 1 mm/min a cross-head speed. Flexural strength (M) =3WI/2bd2 MPa where M W = fracture load (N); I = distance between support points (mm); b = width of sample (mm); and d = thickness of sample (mm). The surface of the fractured samples was viewed under standard error of the mean (SEM) (Phenom ProX, Phenom-World BV, Netherland).


  Results Top


The flexural strength values obtained in the study were statistically analyzed using the software SPSS version 22.0. (IBM; Armonk, New York, United State) The mean flexural strength of each group was calculated, and the normality of the data was analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test. The flexural strength values did not follow normal distribution, therefore nonparametric tests were applied to analyze the flexural strength. Comparison between all the four groups was done using Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test, with Bonferroni correction applied for pair-wise group comparisons.

The mean flexural strength and standard deviation of Group A, Group A1, Group A2, and Group A3 were 141.08 ± 31.27, 176.70 ± 5.51, 189.07 ± 5.52, and 196.71 ± 5.25 Mpa, respectively [Table 1]. Comparison of flexural strength between groups A, A1, A2, and A3 was done using Kruskal-Wallis test [Table 2]. The significant value P was 0.001, which was <0.05, hence it was considered statistically significant. Pair-wise comparison of flexural strength of group A, A1, A2, and A3 was done with MannWhitney test with Bonferroni correction [Table 3]. The comparison of flexural strength between Group A against Group A2 and Group A against Group A3 showed that the statistically significant value P < 0.05, hence it was considered as statistically significant, but it was insignificant for comparison with other groups. The mean flexural strength of the test groups was higher than control group. It was highest for Group A3 (7.5 wt% nanofibers), followed by Group A2 (5 wt% nanofibers) and Group A1 (2.5 wt% nanofibers) [Graph 1].
Table 1: Mean and standard deviation of flexural strength

Click here to view
Table 2: Comparison of flexural strength of samples using Kruskal-Wallis test

Click here to view
Table 3: Pairwise comparison of flexural strength using Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni correction

Click here to view



Under SEM, felspathic ceramic showed smooth areas that were related to the glassy matrix. These irregular areas were related to the presence of leucite clusters dispersion heterogeneously throughout the glassy matrix of felspathic ceramic with dendritic shape and porosities of different diameter [Figure 1]. The test group revealed clusters of Zirconia silica fine nanofibers dispersion in some regions of the glassy matrix along with porosities of different diameter [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Standard error of the mean image of fractured surface of control sample

Click here to view
Figure 2: Standard error of the mean image of fractured surface of test sample

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Dental ceramics possess high esthetic and wear resistance properties utilized the ceramics for various restorative dental procedures.[5] In the present-day, the increased demand for highly esthetic and natural-appearing restorations led to the blooming of new all-ceramic materials with improved mechanical properties.[6],[7],[8]

On reviewing the literature[1],[9],[10] several methods were employed to strengthen ceramics such as chemical strengthening methods by exchange of smaller alkali ions for larger ions, crystalline incorporation to interrupt crack propagation, thermal tempering, and transformation toughening. Glazing was the rarely used method to strengthen ceramics which depends upon the formation of a low expansion outer layer at the elevated temperature.

The previous studies[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18] described various techniques to reinforce veneering or metal ceramics. Nanoscience is the manufacturing of materials in billions of meters or nanometer to 2–3 atoms. The latest research evidenced that the reinforcement of nanofibers alters the physical properties and also improves the mechanical properties of ceramic materials.[19],[20]

In this study, the flexural strength of ceramic reinforced with zirconia silica nanofibers at 2.5%, 5%, and 7.5 were 176.70 ± 5.51, 189.07 ± 5.52, and 196.71 ± 5.25 Mpa, respectively. The 7.5 wt% zirconia-silica nanofibers reinforced samples had higher values followed by samples reinforced with 5 wt% zirconia-silica nanofibers then samples reinforced with 2.5 wt% zirconia-silica nanofibers. This shows that there was improvement in the flexural strength with zirconia-silica nanofibers incorporation. Hence, this study rejected the null hypothesis.

Previous study[21] results showed the flexural strength of ceramic integrated with nano zirconia at 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% were 79.5, 79.1, 92.0, and 96.9, and 92.9 MPa. In this study, the rise in flexural strength of zirconia-silica nanofibers integrated feldspathic ceramic was due to the cross over (bridging) the fracture area. Microcrack propagation in dental ceramic can be resisted by the nanofibers across the crack planes and support the subjected load. Therefore, crack initiation is tolerated by the bridging nanofibers in the ceramic. The phase transformation mechanism of zirconia also had a major role in the toughening effect of ceramic. While propagating the crack, the concentrated stress at the crack spot enables tetragonal crystals of zirconia to transform to stable monoclinic zirconia which tends to close the crack.[3]

Clinical implication

The zirconia-silica nanofibers reinforced feldspathic ceramics have the property of bridging the crack area which further prevents crack propagations. Hence, it is recommended in the areas where subjected to high stresses in the tooth areas.


  Conclusion Top


The flexural strength of zirconia silica nanofibers reinforced feldspathic ceramic by 5 and 7.5% weight were > 2.5 wt% and the conventional feldspathic ceramic.

Author agreement

The authors declared that we did not have receive any funding for this research.

Privacy statement

The names and E-mail addresses entered in this journal site can be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Anusavice KJ. Phillip's science of dental materials. China. 11th ed. USA: Elsevier; 2003. p. 655-717.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ioannis SC. Novel nanocomposites and noanoceramics based on polymer nanofibers using electrospining process-A review. J Mater Process Technol 2005;167:283-93.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Guo G, Fan Y, Zhang JF, Hagan JL, Xu X. Novel dental composites reinforced with zirconia-silica ceramic nanofibers. Dent Mater 2012;28:360-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
El-Saadany AF, El-Safty SM, Karim UM, El-Refaie SK. Reinforcing experimental resin composite with synthesized zirconia and alumina nanofibers: Evaluation of cuspal fracture, flexural strength, flexural modulus and fracture toughness. Tant Dent J 2019;16:149-62.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: A laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:231-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Xiao-ping L, Jie-mo T, Yun-long Z, Ling W. Strength and fracture toughness of MgO-modified glass infiltrated alumina for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater 2002;18:216-20.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Rizkalla AS, Jones DW. Mechanical properties of commercial high strength ceramic core materials. Dent Mater 2004;20:207-12.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Gul BE. Flexural strength and fracture toughness of dental core ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:120-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Deany IL. Recent advances in ceramics for dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7:134-43.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Hondrum SO. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:859-65.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Tore D. Reinforcement of porcelain crowns with silicone carbide fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:40-1.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Tokunaga R, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Kobayashi M, Tonami K, Kurosaki N. Effect of polymorphism of SiO2 addition on mechanical properties of Feldspathic porcelains. Dent Mater J 2008;27:347-55.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kon M, O'Brien WJ, Rasmussen ST, Asaoka K. Mechanical properties of glass-only porcelains prepared by the use of two feldspathic frits with different thermal properties. J Dent Res 2001;80:1758-63.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Chen X, Chadwick TC, Wilson RM, Hill RG, Cattell MJ. Crystallization and flexural strength optimization of fine-grained leucite glass-ceramics for dentistry. Dent Mater 2011;27:1153-61.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Fischer H, Marx R. Improvement of strength parameters of a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic by dual-ion exchange. J Dent Res 2001;80:336-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Rosa V, Yoshimura HN, Pinto MM, Fredericci C, Cesar PF. Effect of ion exchange on strength and slow crack growth of a dental porcelain. Dent Mater 2009;25:736-43.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Fathi H, Johnson A, van Noort R, Ward JM. The influence of calcium fluoride (CaF2) on biaxial flexural strength of apatite-mullite glass-ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2005;21:846-51.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Prasad S, Monaco EA Jr., Kim H, Davis EL, Brewer JD. Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:20-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Jhaveri HM, Balaji PR. Nanotechnolgy: The future of dentistry. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2005;5:15-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
  [Full text]  
20.
Salata O. Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. J Nanobiotechnol 2004;2:3.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Sasikala C, Chander NG. Comparative evaluation of flexural strength of nano-zirconia-integrated pressable feldspathic and lithium disilicate ceramics. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19:339-44.  Back to cited text no. 21
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed326    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded53    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal