Evaluation of the expressed miR-129 and miR-549a in patients with multiple sclerosis
Mina Montazeri1, Nahid Eskandari2, Reza Mansouri3
1 Department of Immunology, International Campus, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2 Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Applied Physiology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
|Date of Submission||21-Oct-2020|
|Date of Decision||25-Apr-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||29-May-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||25-Dec-2021|
Dr. Nahid Eskandari
Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Dr. Reza Mansouri
Department of Immunology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: The expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) as circulating biomarkers has been underlined in multiple sclerosis (MS) in the last decade. Due to the presence of a possible relationship between expressed miRNAs and heterogeneous appearances of the pathological processes in MS, the present study attempts to evaluate the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a in patients with MS in comparison with healthy control (HC) group. Materials and Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were separated from fifty patients with MS (subtypes including relapsing–remitting MS and secondary progressive MS) in the Kashani Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, and fifty people as HC group. After RNA extraction and complementary DNA synthesis, the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a was evaluated in patients with MS in comparison with the HC group using a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. The data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Mann–Whitney tests. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to examine the relationship between miR-129 and miR-549a with age. Results: The results showed that the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a was not significant in patients with MS in comparison with the HC group. Furthermore, the relationship between such miRNAs and age and gender was not significant. Conclusion: We suggest the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a as circulating miRNAs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells could not be considered a biomarker for diagnosis and Para clinical.
Keywords: MicroRNAs, miR-129, human, miR-549a, multiple sclerosis
|How to cite this article:|
Montazeri M, Eskandari N, Mansouri R. Evaluation of the expressed miR-129 and miR-549a in patients with multiple sclerosis. Adv Biomed Res 2021;10:48
|How to cite this URL:|
Montazeri M, Eskandari N, Mansouri R. Evaluation of the expressed miR-129 and miR-549a in patients with multiple sclerosis. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Dec 1];10:48. Available from: https://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2021/10/1/48/333579
| Introduction|| |
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are considered as the major factors involving in the regulation of gene expression at the level of posttranscription through mRNA inhibition and degradation. The other critical functions of miRNAs in the regulation of the immune system have been underlined in the last decade. The important roles of miRNAs in antibody switching, the expression of chemokines and cytokines, proliferation of monocytes and neutrophils, and also development and differentiation of the T- and B-cells elucidate the relationships of miRNAs and autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS).,,
MS is defined as an inflammatory neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system with diverse clinical appearances and different responses to treatment., Although the exact etiology of MS is not clear till now, genetic predisposition, occupational exposure, virus infections, lack of vitamin D, and toxins might be related to the occurrence of this disease., Four disease courses including primary progressive MS (PPMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), progressive-relapsing MS, and relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) have been described for MS in recent years.
According to the aforementioned relationship between miRNAs and autoimmune diseases such as MS, performing more investigations regarding miRNAs and MS might open a new venue for discovering diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in MS. The high stability of the miRNAs in biological samples including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum proposes such markers as potential circulating biomarkers., Recently, miR-129-3p and miR-549a-3p were selected as an appropriate and involved miRNA in MS disease., Moreover, using a bioinformatics approach to analyze differential expression profiles of mRNA and miRNA, MS patients showed significant differences in mRNA and miRNA expression when compared with normal controls.
Previous studies have identified and reported different miRNAs in MS.,,,,,,, Due to the presence of a possible relationship between expressed miRNAs and heterogeneous appearances of the pathological processes in MS, further investigations can unlock the ambiguous questions concerning pathological implications and mediatory duties of miRNAs in the etiopathological mechanisms of MS. For example, one study miR-17-5p has been reported as a deregulated miRNA in MS, and another report has indicated that miR-326 and miR-26a could be a candidate biomarker for MS.,,
Th17 cells perform an essential function in the development of a number of autoimmune disorders (such as MS, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], and psoriasis) and allergy and asthma.,,, Interleukin-17 (IL-17) also acts as a powerful inducer of neutrophil aggregation into the inflammatory tissues. A study in 2016 has reported that osteopointin inhibition of miR-129-3p enhances IL-17 expression and monocyte migration in rheumatoid arthritis. This is done by interfering with the signaling pathway of the AKt/PI3K/Syk. In 2015, Odenthal et al. state that, in patient with adenocarcinoma, miR-549 will sever as a prognostic and predictive marker in gastric cancer, and this miRNA will be regulated by adjuvant injection into these patients. Recent work published by LOffreda et al. in 2020 miR-129-5p is a novel therapeutic target for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A study in 2012 mentioned that some miRNA, including miR-549, were regulated translating and mRNA stability of IL-17 cytokines and receptor through 3́ untranslated region-dependent mechanisms. MiR-549 also identified as potential biomarkers for therapy responses in psoriasis with effect on pathological T cells and dendritic cells in keratinocytes. MiR-129 can also suppress the expression and activity of tumor necrosis factor, IL-10, and IL-6 which are associated with a collagenase-induced intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) rat model. In another study, decreased expression levels of miR-549a in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells and extracellular vesicles in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome could be cited as an important risk factor in MS, SLE, or other diseases presenting overlapping symptoms. The investigations have shown that miR129-5p inhibits the growth and metastases of neuroendocrine tumors. Another study in 2017 elucidated the function of miR-129-5p in a signaling pathway in the revascularization in collagenase-induced ICH rat models. Furthermore, the inhibitory role of miR129-5p has been suggested in the development of encephalomyelitis-related epilepsy. Regarding miR-549, such miRNA, has been introduced as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in patients with gastric cancer., Despite the aforementioned data about the miR129-5p and miR-549, information concerning to the circulating miR-129 and miR-549a in patients with MS are scarce so far. In addition, the identification of novel miRNAs might facilitate the diagnosis, treatment, and treatment following MS in near future. To bridge this scientific gap, this study aimed to evaluate and compare the expression level of miR-129-3p and miR-549a in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of MS patients (RRMS and SPMS subtypes) with healthy individuals.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This study was approved following guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Committee on Ethics of Animal Experimentation of the Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. Informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study.
Patients and sample collection
Fifty individuals who were patient with MS (mean age = 37.7 years; 42 females/8 males), which was identified by lumber puncture and MRI methods, along with fifty people as the healthy control (HC) group (mean age: 37.8 years; 42 females/8 males) were selected from the MS clinic of Kashani Hospital, Isfahan, which was confirmed by a neurologist. Participants in the HC group had no background of any autoimmune diseases, acute, chronic, allergic diseases during the treatment period, and the duration of the study in themselves and first-degree relatives and taking any anti-inflammatory drugs in the last 2 months. The case group is new patients with MS. MS patients in this study were contained two subtypes including RRMS (n = 45) and SPMS (n = 5). The diagnosis of MS was confirmed using the McDonald́ criteria and the New York International Standard. Patients were classified based on the modified Rio score (MRS). The MRS is a simplified version of Rio score, excluding the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) progression and modified items of the relapse rates and MRI activity. The EDSS of all patients was 0 to 6 (mean: 2.69 ± 1.61). Patients and controls were age and sex matched in this study. The demographic information of participants in this study is shown in [Table 1].
Venous blood samples (3 mL for each person) were taken in evacuated tubes (Becton Dickinson, USA). Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation method was used for the isolation of PBMCs. Then, PBMCs were stored at −80°C for performing further experiments.
PBMCs were washed two times in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline; then, total RNA was extracted from PBMCs using RNA Hybrid R™ Kit (Gene All, Korea) according to the manufacturer's procedure. Synthetic miRNA was used to check the accuracy of RNA recovery in samples. NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) was applied to indicate RNA integrity, purity, and concentration (OD 260/280 nm).
Complementary DNA reverse transcription (complementary DNA synthesis)
Seven μL of RNA was used for retro-transcription reactions (in a final volume of 20 μl). The experiments were performed in triplicate using PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Japan) and miR-specific stem-loop primers. A synthetic control sample was utilized for checking the efficiency of complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis and the absence of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) inhibitors.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
qRT-PCR-detection of miRNAs was done on two miRNAs including miR-129 and miR-549a. qRT-PCR was conducted on the diluted cDNA template with assay-specific primers and probes, using RealQ Plus 2x Master Mix Green (Takara, Japan). All qRT-PCR reactions were performed in duplicate, using a StepOnePlus™ RT-PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA).
An expression index was measured by the 2–ΔCT method for relative quantification. The level of miRNA expression was normalized to the small nucleolar RNA (U6 snRNA); as an internal normalization control.
SPSS software (version 20, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) was used for data analysis, and data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was applied for the evaluation of the normal distribution of data. The key difference between parametric (ANOVA) and nonparametric (Mann–Whitney U) test is that the parametric test relies on statistical distributions in data, whereas nonparametric do not depend on any distribution. Nonparametric does not make any assumptions and measures the central tendency with the median value. Due to the fact that the data distribution was skewed and abnormal, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test was conducted to compare the groups (patients [RRMS and SPMS] and HC) in this study. Median (Interquartile range: 25%–75%) was expressed as scale data and P < 0.05 was determined as a statistically significant level. Due to the large dispersion and nonparametric of data, we had to use a box plot instead of a bar or column chart to show the best evaluation between the groups and both miRNAs.
| Results|| |
In this study MiRanda (http://www.microrna.org/microrna/home.do) and TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/), bioinformatic instruments were applied to indicate miRNA potential target mRNAs.
As aforementioned, this is a case–control report that fifty patients (42 female, 8 males; mean age: 37.7 ± 9.1) with MS (45 RRMS and 5 SPMS) and fifty individuals as the HC group (mean age: 37.8 ± 9.2) were age and sex matched in this study. The EDSS of all patients was 0 and 6. As shown in [Table 1], the results of the Chi-square test indicated that the frequently distribution regarding gender and sex was non-significant.
The expression of miR-129 and miR-549a in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy control group
The analysis of qRT-PCR results using a non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test showed that the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a was not significant in the MS patients group (RRMS and SPMS subtypes) in comparison with HC group [P Value miR-129 = 0.107, P Value miR-549a = 0.499, used 2–ΔCT method, [Figure 1]].
|Figure 1: The expression of miR-129 and miR-549a in PBMCs in MS patients in comparison with HC group; (P Value miR-129 = 0.107, P Value miR-549a = 0.499, used 2–ΔCT method)|
Click here to view
The expression of miR-129 and miR-549a in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy control group according to the age
The age average of the participants in this study was considered <40 and ≤40 [Table 1]. The analysis of qRT-PCR results using a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test showed that there was no significant relationship between the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a and the age of the participants in MS patients group (RRMS and SPMS subtypes) and individuals in the HC group [P Value miR-129 in MS patients = 0.723, P Value miR-549a in MS patients = 0.575, P Value miR-129 in HC group = 0.783, P Value miR-549a in HC group = 0.35, used 2–ΔCT method, [Figure 2]].
|Figure 2: The expression of miR-129 and miR-549a in PBMCs in MS patients and HC group according to the age (P Value miR-129 in MS patients = 0.723, P Value miR-549a in MS patients = 0.575) (P Value miR-129 in HC group = 0.783, P Value miR-549a in HC group = 0.35, used 2–ΔCT method)|
Click here to view
The expression of miR-129 and miR-549a in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, in multiple sclerosis patients, and healthy control group according to the gender
Generally, 84 women and 16 men participated in this study [Table 1]. The analysis of qRT-PCR results using a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test showed that there was no significant relationship between the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a and the gender of the participants in MS group (RRMS and SPMS subtypes) and HC group [P Value miR-129 in MS patients = 0.785, P Value miR-549a in MS patients = 0.649, P Value miR-129 in HC group = 0.612, P Value miR-549a in HC group = 0.668, used 2–ΔCT method, [Figure 3]].
|Figure 3: The expression of miR-129 and miR-549a in PBMCs, in MS patients and HC group according to the gender (P Value miR-129 in MS patients = 0.785, P Value miR-549a in MS patients = 0.649) (P Value miR-129 in HC group = 0.612, P Value miR-549a in HC group = 0.668, used 2–ΔCT method)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Circulating miRNAs as potential biomarkers have been investigated in MS in recent years.,, For instance, the improper levels of miRNA have been indicated in T and B lymphocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. MRI evidence has been shown the diverse miRNA profiles in active and chronic lesions in MS. In addition, differentially expression of circulating miRNAs in blood and CSF has been reported in different subtypes of MS. It has been shown that miR-223, miR-23a, and miR-15b downregulate in the serum of MS patients with PPMS and RRMS subtypes. In another study in 2018, the association of miR-128-3p and miR-24-3p with disease activity and disability accumulation have been reveled in MS, respectively.
The results of our study indicated the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a was not significant in MS patients group in comparison with the HC group. In the first impression, it is concluded that miR-129 and miR-549a could not suggest as circulating miRNAs in MS. Due to the rare information concerning the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a in MS patients, further studies are needed to confirm our results in future. The effect of treatment was not checked on the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a in RRMS and SPMS subtypes of MS in this study. More investigations in this regard might propose such miRNAs as therapeutic targets or markers for following treatment of MS in future.
In previous studies, age and gender have been highlighted as two important involving factors in MS;,, therefore, our study focused on the possible relationships between the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a and these factors. Although our study showed a statistically nonsignificant correlation between age, gender, and the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a in MS and HC groups, because of the small sample size. Conducting similar studies with the larger statistical population will clarify the exact relationship of age and gender in the expression of miR-129 and miR-549a in MS patients.
These results may be explained by the fact that the sites and contexts as well as stage of diseases are highly important. It seems that results from studies have been investigated miR-129 and miR-549a expression in the site of inflammation and in patients with active phase of autoimmune disease; miR-129 and miR-549a expressed at the highest levels rather than studies have been investigated miR-129 and miR-549a expression in noninflammatory sites such as peripheral blood and in patients with inactive phase of disease. On the other hand, the difference in the level of expression at T-cells in different autoimmune diseases by T-cells is also evidence of the complexity of the immune system's function against each disease.,,
The literature lacks strong evidence regarding miR-129 and miR-549a expression, we recommend the future studies evaluating miR-129 and miR-549a expression in CSF and its level in different courses of MS disease.
| Conclusion|| |
Recently, miRNAs have been suggested as important circulating biomarkers in the diagnosis, treatment, and following treatment of diseases such as MS.,,, Although different factors including gender, age, and different subtypes of MS might be involved in the expression miRNAs level in MS patients, expression of miR-129 and miR-549a was not significant in our study regarding age and gender. However, the validation of the expression of the miR-129 and miR-549a using further experiments is warranted in MS patients.
This study was extracted from Mina Montazeri's MSc thesis and was financially supported by the Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Research of the Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences (grant number 1007192). We would like to deeply appreciate Dr. Mohammad Kazemi and the staff of Isfahan Central Laboratory.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Vistbakka J, Sumelahti ML, Lehtimäki T, Elovaara I, Hagman S. Evaluation of serum miR-191-5p, miR-24-3p, miR-128-3p, and miR-376c-3 in multiple sclerosis patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2018;138:130-6.
Zhang L, Wu H, Zhao M, Chang C, Lu Q. Clinical significance of miRNAs in autoimmunity. J Autoimmun 2020;109:102438.
Tahamtan A, Teymoori-Rad M, Nakstad B, Salimi V. Anti-inflammatory microRNAs and their potential for inflammatory diseases treatment. Front Immunol 2018;9:1377.
Olek MJ, Howard J. Evaluation and Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis in Adults. Wolters Kluwer: UpToDate; 2019.
Kadowaki A, Quintana FJ. The Gut-CNS axis in multiple sclerosis. Trends Neurosci 2020;43:622-34.
Chen C, Zhou Y, Wang J, Yan Y, Peng L, Qiu W. Dysregulated microRNA involvement in multiple sclerosis by induction of T helper 17 cell differentiation. Front Immunol 2018;9:1256.
Ghasemi N, Razavi S, Nikzad E. Multiple sclerosis: Pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnoses and cell-based therapy. Cell J 2017;19:1-10.
Eshaghi A, Young AL, Wijeratne PA, Prados F, Arnold DL, Narayanan S, et al.
Identifying multiple sclerosis subtypes using unsupervised machine learning and MRI data. Nat Commun 2021;12:2078.
Viswambharan V, Thanseem I, Vasu MM, Poovathinal SA, Anitha A. miRNAs as biomarkers of neurodegenerative disorders. Biomark Med 2017;11:151-67.
Dweep H, Gretz N, Sticht C. miRWalk database for miRNA-target interactions. Methods Mol Biol 2014;1182:289-305.
Martinez B, Peplow PV. MicroRNAs as disease progression biomarkers and therapeutic targets in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis. Neural Regen Res 2020;15:1831-7.
] [Full text]
Misso G, Zarone MR, Lombardi A, Grimaldi A, Cossu AM, Ferri C, et al.
miR-125b upregulates miR-34a and sequentially activates stress adaption and Cell death mechanisms in multiple myeloma. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2019;16:391-406.
Orefice NS, Guillemot-Legris O, Capasso R, Bottemanne P, Hantraye P, Caraglia M, et al.
miRNA profile is altered in a modified EAE mouse model of multiple sclerosis featuring cortical lesions. Elife 2020;9. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56916.
Liguori M, Nuzziello N, Licciulli F, Consiglio A, Simone M, Viterbo RG, et al.
Combined microRNA and mRNA expression analysis in pediatric multiple sclerosis: An integrated approach to uncover novel pathogenic mechanisms of the disease. Hum Mol Genet 2018;27:66-79.
Zhou B, Zuo XX, Li YS, Gao SM, Dai XD, Zhu HL, et al.
Integration of microRNA and mRNA expression profiles in the skin of systemic sclerosis patients. Sci Rep 2017;7:42899.
Islam T, Rahman MR, Karim MR, Huq F, Quinn JM, Moni MA. Detection of multiple sclerosis using blood and brain cells transcript profiles: Insights from comprehensive bioinformatics approach. Inform Med Unlocked 2019;16:100201.
Basak J, Majsterek I. miRNA-Dependent CD4+
T cell differentiation in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Int 2021;2021:8825588.
Ma X, Zhou J, Zhong Y, Jiang L, Mu P, Li Y, et al.
Expression, regulation and function of microRNAs in multiple sclerosis. Int J Med Sci 2014;11:810-8.
Fattahi M, Eskandari N, Sotoodehnejadnematalahi F, Shaygannejad V, Kazemi M. Comparison of the expression of miR-326 between interferon beta responders and non-responders in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Cell J 2020;22:92-5.
Karimi L, Eskandari N, Shaygannejad V, Zare N, Andalib A, Khanahmad H, et al.
Comparison of expression levels of miR-29b-3p and miR-326 in T helper-1 and T helper-17 cells isolated from responsive and non-responsive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon-beta. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020;19:416-25.
Gao Y, Han D, Feng J. MicroRNA in multiple sclerosis. Clin Chim Acta 2021;516:92-9.
Yasuda K, Takeuchi Y, Hirota K. The pathogenicity of Th17 cells in autoimmune diseases. Semin Immunopathol 2019;41:283-97.
Huang J, Xu X, Yang J. miRNAs alter T helper 17 cell fate in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol 2021;12:593473.
Li B, Huang L, Lv P, Li X, Liu G, Chen Y, et al.
The role of Th17 cells in psoriasis. Immunol Res 2020;68:296-309.
Halwani R, Sultana A, Vazquez-Tello A, Jamhawi A, Al-Masri AA, Al-Muhsen S. Th-17 regulatory cytokines IL-21, IL-23, and IL-6 enhance neutrophil production of IL-17 cytokines during asthma. J Asthma 2017;54:893-904.
Jafarzadeh A, Ahangar-Parvin R, Nemat M, Taghipour Z, Shamsizadeh A, Ayoobi F, et al.
Ginger extract modulates the expression of IL-12 and TGF-β in the central nervous system and serum of mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Avicenna J Phytomed 2017;7:54-65.
Tsai CH, Liu SC, Wang YH, Su CM, Huang CC, Hsu CJ, et al.
Osteopontin inhibition of miR-129-3p enhances IL-17 expression and monocyte migration in rheumatoid arthritis. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2017;1861:15-22.
Odenthal M, Hee J, Gockel I, Sisic L, Schmitz J, Stoecklein NH, et al.
Serum microRNA profiles as prognostic/predictive markers in the multimodality therapy of locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. Int J Cancer 2015;137:230-7.
Hawley ZC, Campos-Melo D, Strong MJ. MiR-129-5p: A novel therapeutic target for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? Noncoding RNA Investig 2020;4. doi: 10.21037/ncri-20-5.
Mai J, Virtue A, Male y E, Tran T, Yin Y, Meng S, et al.
MicroRNAs and other mechanisms regulate interleukin-17 cytokines and receptors. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2012;4:1478-95.
Liu Q, Wu DH, Han L, Deng JW, Zhou L, He R, et al.
Roles of microRNAs in psoriasis: Immunological functions and potential biomarkers. Exp Dermatol 2017;26:359-67.
Ma XL, Li SY, Shang F. Effect of microRNA-129-5p targeting HMGB1-RAGE signaling pathway on revascularization in a collagenase-induced intracerebral hemorrhage rat model. Biomed Pharmacother 2017;93:238-44.
Almenar-Pérez E, Sarría L, Nathanson L, Oltra E. Assessing diagnostic value of microRNAs from peripheral blood mononuclear cells and extracellular vesicles in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Sci Rep 2020;10:2064.
Døssing KB, Binderup T, Kaczkowski B, Jacobsen A, Rossing M, Winther O, et al.
Down-regulation of miR-129-5p and the let-7 family in neuroendocrine tumors and metastases leads to up-regulation of their targets Egr1, G3bp1, Hmga2 and Bach1. Genes (Basel) 2014;6:1-21.
Liu AH, Wu YT, Wang YP. MicroRNA-129-5p inhibits the development of autoimmune encephalomyelitis-related epilepsy by targeting HMGB1 through the TLR4/NF-kB signaling pathway. Brain Res Bull 2017;132:139-49.
Yuan HL, Wang T, Zhang KH. MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for diagnosis, therapy and prognosis of gastric cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2018;11:3891-900.
Csépány T. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A review of the 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Ideggyogy Sz 2018;71:321-9.
Tutuncu M, Altintas A, Dogan BV, Uygunoglu U, Kale Icen N, Elmalı Karakaya A, et al.
The use of Modified Rio score for determining treatment failure in patients with multiple sclerosis: Retrospective descriptive case series study. Acta Neurol Belg 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-020-01476-2
Kacperska MJ, Jastrzebski K, Tomasik B, Walenczak J, Konarska-Krol M, Glabinski A. Selected extracellular microRNA as potential biomarkers of multiple sclerosis activity – Preliminary study. J Mol Neurosci 2015;56:154-63.
Bruno DCF, Donatti A, Martin M, Almeida VS, Geraldis JC, Oliveira FS, et al.
Circulating nucleic acids in the plasma and serum as potential biomarkers in neurological disorders. Braz J Med Biol Res 2020;53:e9881.
Ebrahimkhani S, Vafaee F, Young PE, Hur SSJ, Hawke S, Devenney E, et al.
Exosomal microRNA signatures in multiple sclerosis reflect disease status. Sci Rep 2017;7:14293.
Huang Q, Xiao B, Ma X, Qu M, Li Y, Nagarkatti P, et al.
MicroRNAs associated with the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2016;295-296:148-61.
Martinez B, Peplow PV. MicroRNAs in blood and cerebrospinal fluid as diagnostic biomarkers of multiple sclerosis and to monitor disease progression. Neural Regen Res 2020;15:606-19.
] [Full text]
Fenoglio C, Ridolfi E, Cantoni C, De Riz M, Bonsi R, Serpente M, et al.
Decreased circulating miRNA levels in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2013;19:1938-42.
Ysrraelit MC, Correale J. Impact of sex hormones on immune function and multiple sclerosis development. Immunology 2019;156:9-22.
Lasrado N, Jia T, Massilamany C, Franco R, Illes Z, Reddy J. Mechanisms of sex hormones in autoimmunity: Focus on EAE. Biol Sex Differ 2020;11:50.
Musella A, Gentile A, Rizzo FR, De Vito F, Fresegna D, Bullitta S, et al.
Interplay between age and neuroinflammation in multiple sclerosis: Effects on motor and cognitive functions. Front Aging Neurosci 2018;10:238.
Feng J, Guo J, Wang JP, Chai BF. MiR-129-5p inhibits proliferation of gastric cancer cells through targeted inhibition on HMGB1 expression. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020;24:3665-73.
Xu S, Yi XM, Zhang ZY, Ge JP, Zhou WQ. miR-129 predicts prognosis and inhibits cell growth in human prostate carcinoma. Mol Med Rep 2016;14:5025-32.
Condrat CE, Thompson DC, Barbu MG, Bugnar OL, Boboc A, Cretoiu D, et al.
miRNAs as biomarkers in disease: Latest findings regarding their role in diagnosis and prognosis. Cells 2020;9:276. doi:10.3390/cells9020276.
Piket E, Zheleznyakova GY, Kular L, Jagodic M. Small non-coding RNAs as important players, bi omarkers and therapeutic targets in multiple sclerosis: A comprehensive overview. J Autoimmun 2019;101:17-25.
Wang J, Chen J, Sen S. MicroRNA as biomarkers and diagnostics. J Cell Physiol 2016;231:25-30.
Scărlătescu AI, Micheu MM, Popa-Fotea NM, DorobanB;u M. MicroRNAs in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction-A new tool for diagnosis and prognosis: Therapeutic implications. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:4799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094799
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]