Users Online: 605
Home Print this page Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Ahead of Print Instructions Subscribe Contacts Special issues Login 


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
BRIEF REPORT
Adv Biomed Res 2022,  11:90

Antibacterial effect of some eukaryotic sterol biosynthesis inhibitors


1 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Payam Noor University, Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

Date of Submission21-Sep-2021
Date of Acceptance12-Mar-2022
Date of Web Publication29-Oct-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mohammad Reza Haeri
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_291_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Isoprenoids and their derivatives are building blocks for the synthesis of biomolecules with important biological functions such as cholesterol in eukaryotes and lipid carrier undecaprenol, which is involved in cell wall biosynthesis in bacteria. With the global threat of multidrug-resistant bacteria, there is a need for finding new metabolic targets for killing bacteria. In the present study, we examined the impact of eukaryotic sterol biosynthesis inhibitors on the growth of four pathogenic bacteria.
Materials and Methods: Antibacterial effect of HMG CoA reductase inhibitor (simvastatin), farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase inhibitor (alendronate), squalene epoxidase inhibitor (terbinafine), and lanosterol demethylase inhibitor (ketoconazole) were studied against four pathogenic bacteria: two gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis and two gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Broth microdilution method was used for assessing the antibacterial susceptibility of the components using 96 well plats. MIC and MBC were determined visibly.
Results: MIC of Ketoconazole for Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis were 0.166 and 1 mg/mL, respectively. Terbinafine had a weak inhibitory effect on Staphylococcus aureus (MIC: 8 mg/mL). Ketoconazole and terbinafine had no inhibitory effect on gram-negative bacteria. MBC of Simvastatin for both Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis was 0.5 mg/mL and of Alendronate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 6.6 mg/mL.
Conclusion: Our results show that farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase and class II HMG-CoA reductases inhibitors (ketoconazole and simvastatin) have reasonable antibacterial activity against gram-positive bacteria. These two enzymes provide suitable targets for designing new antibiotics based on modifying the chemical structure of currently used drugs to obtain maximum activity.

Keywords: Antibacterial agent, antibiotics, biosynthesis, inhibitors, isoprenoid, sterol


How to cite this article:
Arjmand G, Haeri MR. Antibacterial effect of some eukaryotic sterol biosynthesis inhibitors. Adv Biomed Res 2022;11:90

How to cite this URL:
Arjmand G, Haeri MR. Antibacterial effect of some eukaryotic sterol biosynthesis inhibitors. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 3];11:90. Available from: https://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2022/11/1/90/359886




  Introduction Top


The development of bacterial resistance to antibiotics and the deficit in the findings of new bacterial targets have raised global concern.[1] Isoprenoid biosynthesis is an essential highway that provides a key route for the synthesis of thousands of vital biomolecules such as coenzyme Q in electron transport chains, hopanoids in bacteria and sterols in eubacteria and eukaryotes as membranes components, and carotenoids in eukaryotes and prokaryotes.[2] This pathway is vital for bacterial life; therefore, blocking the enzymes involved may kill bacteria.[3] Many of the enzymes that are involved in isoprenoid biosynthesis in eukaryotes are drug targets; for example, simvastatin inhibits the early stage of cholesterol biosynthesis in humans to reduce serum cholesterol,[4] while terbinafine exerts its fungicidal effect by blocking the end stages of sterol biosynthesis in fungi.[5]

Isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP) are important intermediate molecules for isoprenoid biosynthesis[6]. The final product of IPP metabolism in eukaryotes is cholesterol, but in bacteria, it is converted to a wide variety of biomolecules including lipid carrier undecaprenol,[7],[8] which are, respectively, involved in bacterial cell wall biosynthesis and electron transport.

There are two main pathways for the biosynthesis of IPP in bacteria, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GAP)–pyruvate pathway found mostly in gram-negative bacteria[9] and mevalonate pathway found in gram-positive bacteria.[2],[8] However, analysis of microbial genome sequences has revealed that some gram-negative bacteria encode only enzymes of the mevalonate pathway.[10] In humans and bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, isoprenoids are formed in the mevalonate pathway. The mevalonate pathway in eukaryotes and eubacteria begins with the production of HMG-CoA from acetoacetyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA by HMG-CoA synthase.[11],[12],[13]

The next step involves HMG-CoA reductase, which converts HMG-CoA to mevalonic acid. Statins target this enzyme in humans to lower blood cholesterol levels.[4] In Enterococcus faecalis, HMG-CoA synthesis and subsequent reduction are performed by a dual-action enzyme.[14] Pravastatin has been reported to inhibit purified bacterial HMG-CoA reductase in vitro.[15] Mevalonate is converted to IPP, and then farnesylpyrophosphate synthase condenses IPP and DMAPP to form farnesylpyrophosphate. In humans, bisphosphonates (alendronate) used to treat osteoporosis, strongly inhibit this reaction to induce apoptosis in osteoclasts.[16],[17] A gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus has been reported to engage FPPS.[18],[19] Condensing two molecules of FPP yields squalene, which is epoxidized and then cyclized to form lanosterol.[20] Fungal squalene epoxidase is selectively inhibited by the allylamines and terbinafine.[21] Lanosterol is then converted to zymosterol by sterol demethylase, a reaction that is blocked by azoles class of antifungal drugs such as ketoconazole, miconazole, and clotrimazole.[22] Some kinds of bacteria such as Streptomyces strains contain monooxygenases, which may be homologs to sterol demethylase that is inhibited by azoles.[23]

As shown here, isoprenoid biosynthesis can be a new and promising target for finding new antibiotics. We can find several drugs in drugstores that have been designed for eukaryotic pathogens. Furthermore, there are many similarities in isoprenoid and sterol biosynthesis between eukaryotes and prokaryotes. In the present study, to assess the antibacterial properties of some eukaryotic sterol biosynthesis inhibitors, we selected two gram-positive bacteria having enzymes of the mevalonate pathway and two gram-negative bacteria having alternative pathways as reference.


  Materials and Methods Top


Chemicals and microorganisms

Simvastatin, alendronate, terbinafine, and ketoconazole were purchased from pharmaceutical companies (Poorsina or Osve, Iran). The culture medium was purchased from Merck (Germany). The organisms, including Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 2599), E. coli (ATCC 25922), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) were obtained from Pasteur cell bank.

Antimicrobial susceptibility assay

At first, a suspension of each bacterium up to turbidity equal to that of a 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared in sterile saline. Different concentrations of each test compound, simvastatin, alendronate, terbinafine, and ketoconazole ranging 8–0.015 mg/mL were prepared by dissolving the statin in absolute methanol.

For measuring minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), we used a serial dilution assay in 96 well plates. At first 25 μl of TSB, then 200 μl bacterial suspension (1.5 × 105 bacteria/mL, equal to 1/1000 of 0.5 McFarland standard), and finally 25 μl of drugs were added into wells. Two wells for solvent and growth control were included in each set of the experiment. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h.[24] All the experiments were performed in triplicate. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of the drugs that inhibits bacterial growth so that had no visible turbidity. MBC was determined by subculturing the clear wells (two wells before and after the well that showed MIC) to agar plates that do not contain the drugs. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h.

Statistical analysis

Student t-test was performed to compare treatments with growth control using Excel software. P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The results were expressed as Mean ± SE.


  Results Top


After 24 h of incubation under aerobic conditions, simvastatin showed inhibitory effects on gram-positive bacteria. MIC and MBC for Staphylococcus aureus were 0.5 ± 0 mg/mL and for Enterococcus faecalis was 1 ± 0 mg/mL (P = 0.0001). However, simvastatin had no inhibitory effect on gram-negative bacteria [Table 1].
Table 1: Minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration of tested drugs on two gram-positive and two gram-negative bacteria

Click here to view


Alendronate could inhibit the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a concentration higher than 6 mg/mL but had no inhibitory effect on other bacteria. In this case, MIC was 6.66 ± 2.3 (P = 0.0001) and MBC was 8 ± 0 mg/mL. Terbinafine in a concentration equal to 8 ± 0 mg/mL could inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus aureus (MIC was equal to MBC = 8 ± 0 mg/mL).

Lowest minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentration of ketoconazole was seen against Staphylococcus aureus, in which MIC = 0.166 ± 0.07 (P = 0.001) and MBC = 0.416 ± 0.1 mg/mL (P = 0.018). Furthermore, ketoconazole could reduce the growth of Enterococcus faecalis, MIC = 1 ± 0 mg/mL and MBC = 2 ± 0 mg/mL (P = 0.0001). Predictably, ketoconazole had no inhibitory effect on gram-negative bacteria.


  Discussion Top


Our results show that tested drugs, which are known as sterol biosynthesis inhibitors, had an inhibitory effect mainly on gram-positive bacteria. Action sites of the drugs on the mevalonate pathway are shown in [Figure 1].[25]
Figure 1: Isoprenoid biosynthesis pathway indicating the main steps, enzymes involved, and sites of enzyme inhibition by known inhibitors (adapted from reference[25])

Click here to view


Simvastatin has proven an ability to inhibit HMG-COA reductase.[4] Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus have close relationships in the phylogenic tree because of having mevalonate pathway and its rate-limiting enzyme HMG-COA reductase.[26] Therefore, it has a great probability that simvastatin could affect the growth of two-gram positive bacteria through inhibition of HMG-COA reductase.

Two classes of HMG-COA reductase have been identified. The class I genes are present in all eukaryotes, some archaea, and Streptomycetes, and class II genes are present in some Eubacteria[22] such as Staphylococcus aureus.[12] These two classes of HMG-COA reductase are structurally different.[27] Therefore, it is obvious that a higher concentration of simvastatin, a class I inhibitor, is needed to inhibit class II that is present in bacteria. This means simvastatin is less specific for class I HMG-COA reductase than class II. This nonspecificity is seen for all drugs used in this study.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a gram-negative bacteria independent of the mevalonate pathway but has farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase as a part of the isoprenoid biosynthesis pathway [Figure 1]. Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase is inhibited in vitro by the bisphosphonate class, which includes alendronate.[28] Our results show that alendronate inhibited the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at a concentration not lower than 8 mg/mL. Alendronate is a highly negatively charged bisphosphonate that made it difficult to pass through the bacterial membrane. This effect can be seen in other bacteria with different cell wall compositions. As seen in [Table 1], alendronate had no significant inhibitory effect on Staphylococcus aureus. Therefore, there is a need to modify the chemical structure of bisphosphonates to overcome this obstacle.

Terbinafine and ketoconazole exert their antifungal activity, respectively, through inhibiting squalene epoxidase[29] and lanosterol demethylase.[22] Squalene epoxidase and lanosterol demethylase are two enzymes in the final steps of steroid biosynthesis [Figure 1] that are not found in all kinds of bacteria and archaea.[30],[31] Accordingly, squalene epoxidase and lanosterol demethylase inhibitors did not affect the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and E. coli. However, if this reason is plausible for all of the bacteria, we should have seen no effect of terbinafine and ketoconazole on Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis, whereas ketoconazole showed the most potent effect (with the lowest MBC) seen in this study on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and with the lesser extent on Enterococcus faecalis [Table 1]. Moreover, terbinafine showed little effect only on Staphylococcus aureus. McLean and his colleagues reported the potent inhibitory effect of azole antifungals (sterol demethylases inhibitors) against Mycobacterium that previously was considered to be devoid of the enzyme.[32] These data indicate that terbinafine and ketoconazole have found targets in bacteria that were not previously known. One other possible mechanism for ketoconazole could be changing membrane permeability for potassium.[33] However, further research is needed to understand the exact mechanisms of action of ketoconazole, especially in Staphylococcus aureus.

Some steps of steroid synthesis have recently been discovered in some bacteria.[34] Moreover, cephalosporin P1, helvolic acid, and their derivatives, which have close structural similarity to sterol backbone, show strong bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus,[35] indicating the possibilities of sterol synthesis in S. aureus. Therefore, there is a need to find the exact mechanisms of action of ketoconazole in Staphylococcus aureus in future studies.


  Conclusion Top


Finding new targets to kill antibiotic-resistant bacteria is now necessarily important. In the present study, we used the drugs that are known as the inhibitors of the enzymes of the eukaryotic isoprenoid biosynthesis pathway, to target bacterial enzymes. Our results show that farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase and class II HMG-CoA reductases that are, respectively, targeted by ketoconazole and simvastatin represent promising points for new antibacterial agents. Among the drugs tested, ketoconazole and simvastatin can be considered as drug candidates against some pathogenic bacteria.

Acknowledgment

We sincerely thank Mrs. Rezaei for her technical assistance.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflict of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Aslam B, Wang W, Arshad MI, Khurshid M, Muzammil S, Rasool MH, et al. Antibiotic resistance: A rundown of a global crisis. Infect Drug Resist 2018;11:1645-58.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Clomburg JM, Qian S, Tan Z, Cheong S, Gonzalez R. The isoprenoid alcohol pathway, a synthetic route for isoprenoid biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019;116:12810-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hoshino Y, Gaucher EA. On the origin of isoprenoid biosynthesis. Mol Biol Evol 2018;35:2185-97.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lioudakis E, Lucitt M. Statin disruption of cholesterol metabolism and altered innate inflammatory responses in atherosclerosis. Immunometabolism 2021;3:e210023.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ryder NS. Terbinafine: Mode of action and properties of the squalene epoxidase inhibition. Br J Dermatol 1992;126(Suppl 39):2-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Perez-Gil J, Rodriguez-Concepcion M. Metabolic plasticity for isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria. Biochem J 2013;452:19-25.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Heuston S, Begley M, Gahan CG, Hill C. Isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacterial pathogens. Microbiology 2012;158:1389-401.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Chang HY, Cheng TH, Wang AH. Structure, catalysis, and inhibition mechanism of prenyltransferase. IUBMB Life 2021;73:40-63.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Chatzivasileiou AO, Ward V, Edgar SM, Stephanopoulos G. Two-step pathway for isoprenoid synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2019;116:506-11.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Wilding EI, Brown JR, Bryant AP, Chalker AF, Holmes DJ, Ingraham KA, et al. Identification, evolution, and essentiality of the mevalonate pathway for isopentenyl diphosphate biosynthesis in gram-positive cocci. J Bacteriol 2000;182:4319-27.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Campobasso N, Patel M, Wilding IE, Kallender H, Rosenberg M, Gwynn MN. Staphylococcus aureus 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase: Crystal structure and mechanism. J Biol Chem 2004;279:44883-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wang Q, Quan S, Xiao H. Towards efficient terpenoid biosynthesis: Manipulating IPP and DMAPP supply. Bioresour Bioprocess 2019;6 :1-13.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Friesen, J.A., Rodwell, V.W. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductases. Genome Biol 5, 248 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-11-248  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hedl M, Sutherlin A, Wilding EI, Mazzulla M, McDevitt D, Lane P, et al. Enterococcus faecalis acetoacetyl-coenzyme A thiolase/3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, a dual-function protein of isopentenyl diphosphate biosynthesis. J Bacteriol 2002;184:2116-22.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hedl M, Rodwell VW. Inhibition of the class II HMG-CoA reductase of pseudomonas mevalonii. Protein Sci 2004;13:1693-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Rogers MJ, Munoz MA. From vesicle to cytosol. Elife 2018;7:e38847.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Chang J, Wang W, Zhang H, Hu Y, Yin Z. Bisphosphonates regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis and pro-osteoclastic expression in MG-63 human osteosarcoma cells. Oncol Lett 2012;4:299-304.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Desai J, Liu YL, Wei H, Liu W, Ko TP, Guo RT, et al. Structure, function, and inhibition of staphylococcus aureus heptaprenyl diphosphate synthase. Chem Med Chem 2016;11:1915-23.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Lin FY, Liu CI, Liu YL, Zhang Y, Wang K, Jeng WY, Ko TP, Cao R, Wang AH, Oldfield E. Mechanism of action and inhibition of dehydrosqualene synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:21337-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 1010907107.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Cerqueira NM, Oliveira EF, Gesto DS, Santos-Martins D, Moreira C, Moorthy HN, et al. Cholesterol biosynthesis: A mechanistic overview. Biochemistry 2016;55:5483-506.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Nowosielski M, Hoffmann M, Wyrwicz LS, Stepniak P, Plewczynski DM, Lazniewski M, et al. Detailed mechanism of squalene epoxidase inhibition by terbinafine. J Chem Inf Model 2011;51:455-62.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Jordá T, Puig S. Regulation of ergosterol biosynthesis in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes (Basel) 2020;11:795.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Alsterholm M, Karami N, Faergeman J. Antimicrobial activity of topical skin pharmaceuticals an in vitro study. Acta Derm Venereol 2010;90:239-45.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. J Pharm Anal 2016;6:71-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
de Souza W, Rodrigues JC. Sterol biosynthesis pathway as target for anti-trypanosomatid drugs. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2009, 1-19.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Rohdich F, Bacher A, Eisenreich W. Isoprenoid biosynthetic pathways as anti-infective drug targets. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005; 33785-791.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Miller BR, Kung Y. Structural features and domain movements controlling substrate binding and cofactor specificity in class II HMG-CoA reductase. Biochemistry 2018;57:654-62.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Schmidberger JW, Schnell R, Schneider G. Structural characterization of substrate and inhibitor binding to farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2015;71:721-31.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Martinez-Rossi NM, Bitencourt TA, Peres NTA, Lang EAS, Gomes EV, Quaresemin NR, et al. Dermatophyte resistance to antifungal drugs: Mechanisms and prospectus. Front Microbiol 2018;9:1108.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Kon T, Nemoto N, Oshima T, Yamagishi A. Effects of a squalene epoxidase inhibitor, terbinafine, on ether lipid biosyntheses in a thermoacidophilic archaeon, thermoplasma acidophilum. J Bacteriol 2002;184:1395-401.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Lee AK, Banta AB, Wei JH, Kiemle DJ, Feng J, Giner JL, et al. C-4 sterol demethylation enzymes distinguish bacterial and eukaryotic sterol synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:5884-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
McLean KJ, Marshall KR, Richmond A, Hunter IS, Fowler K, Kieser T, et al. Azole antifungals are potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 mono-oxygenases and bacterial growth in mycobacteria and streptomycetes. Microbiology 2002;148:2937-49.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Calahorra M, Lozano C, Sa nchez NS, Pena A. Ketoconazole and miconazole alter potassium homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1808:433-45.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Darnet S, Schaller H. Metabolism and biological activities of 4-methyl-sterols. Molecules 2019;24:451.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Lv JM, Hu D, Gao H, Kushiro T, Awakawa T, Chen GD, et al. Biosynthesis of helvolic acid and identification of an unusual C-4-demethylation process distinct from sterol biosynthesis. Nat Commun 2017;8:1644.  Back to cited text no. 35
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed230    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded40    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal