Users Online: 8876
Home Print this page Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Ahead of Print Instructions Subscribe Contacts Special issues Login 


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Adv Biomed Res 2023,  12:182

Study of auditory brainstem evoked response at varying frequencies in subclinical hypothyroid subjects


1 Department of Physiology, IGIMS, Patna, Bihar, India
2 Department of Psychiatry, IGIMS, Patna, Bihar, India

Date of Submission07-Dec-2022
Date of Acceptance10-Feb-2023
Date of Web Publication20-Jul-2023

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Niska Sinha
Department of Psychiatry, IGIMS, Patna - 800 014, Bihar
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_418_22

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Hearing deterioration in hypothyroid subject was documented by Kemp. Cristiane et al. reported delayed waves latency in subclinical hypothyroid subjects. Recording of auditory brain stem evoked response in subclinical hypothyroid subjects at 80 dB and varying frequencies has been done.
Materials and Methods: Case control study. Group 1, N = 30 control subjects, free T3, free T4, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) within normal range. Group 2, N = 30 subclinical hypothyroid subjects, TSH was between 4.6-8 microIU/L. Student Unpaired t test was done. Those on epileptic, neuroleptics, depression, psychosis drugs, inflammatory, proliferative, traumatic ear disorder, smokers, on tobacco, COVID-19 positive subjects, altered sensorium, drug abuse, diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, family history of hearing disorder, and furosemide drug were excluded. Auditory brainstem evoked response (ABER) done.
Results: Mean ± SD of Brainstem evoked response auditory (BERA) waves III, V, interpeak latencies at 80 dB, 2, 4,6 KHz reported delay and significant in subclinical hypothyroid group as compared to control.
Conclusion: BERA study at 6 KHz and 80 dB detects central neuropathy earlier in subclinical hypothyroid patients.

Keywords: Brainstem auditory evoked potential, hearing impairment, subclinical hypothyroid, thyroid stimulating hormone


How to cite this article:
Jha I, Alam K, Keshari KK, Sinha N, Kumar T. Study of auditory brainstem evoked response at varying frequencies in subclinical hypothyroid subjects. Adv Biomed Res 2023;12:182

How to cite this URL:
Jha I, Alam K, Keshari KK, Sinha N, Kumar T. Study of auditory brainstem evoked response at varying frequencies in subclinical hypothyroid subjects. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 28];12:182. Available from: https://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2023/12/1/182/382073




  Introduction Top


Hearing deterioration in hypothyroid subjects was documented by Kemp.[1] Audiometrically, it was first documented by Hilger.[2] Ozata et al. did not find any alteration in auditory brainstem evoked response in subclinical hypothyroid subjects.[3] The hearing deterioration may be sensorineural, conductive, or both.[4] The subclinical hypothyroidism has mild increase in TSH (4.6-8.0 mIU/mL) along with free T4 within normal range. These findings may be accompanied by mood swings, fatigue, and weight gain.[5]

Brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) is a non-invasive electrophysiological test which records the auditory pathway potentials from the ear to the brainstem. It detects deterioration of auditory pathway early.[6] This study plans to record auditory brainstem evoked response (ABER) in subclinical hypothyroid subjects at varying frequencies of 2 KHz, 4 KHz, 6 KHz, and 80 dB. Relation of BAEP with antibodies of thyroid and central neuropathy has been done.


  Material and Methods Top


Institutional Ethical Committee approval procedure was taken. Every participant gave the consent. A case control study started in December 2021 till November 2022 in the Dept of Physiology, IGIMS, Patna.

Subclinical hypothyroid subjects between 20 and 50 years of either sex were selected in the Department of Medicine IGIMS, Patna.

Group 1, N = 30 subjects with TSH less than 4.6 microIU/L and the age between 20 and 50 years were enrolled as control group.

Group 2, N = 30 subclinical hypothyroid patients with TSH between 4.6 and 8 microIU/L and age between 20 and 50 years were enrolled as cases. Subjects with increase TSH, Free T3, and Free T4 within normal range were selected. TSH, Free T3, T4 level, antibodies against thyroglobulin, and thyroid peroxidase were detected by Electrochemiluminescence assay.

It was hypothesized that ABER waves latency and interpeak intervals would be prolonged in subjects of subclinical hypothyroidism. Size of sample calculated by AI-therapy statistics BETA the large effect size taken was (0.8). The alpha value considered was 0.05.[6] Power considered here was 80% for one tailed hypothesis.[7] Subjects needed were 52 (26 in each group).

The patients taking drugs for psychosis, depression, epilepsies, and neuroleptics are excluded. Smokers, COVID-19 positive subjects, altered sensorium, and drug abuse were excluded. Patients with diabetes mellitus, chronic illness, family history of deafness, intake of ototoxic drugs, occupational history of loud noise, and ear disease or infection were excluded. For hearing loss Rennie's and Webbers tests were done.

Weight of body is measured in kilograms with the help of portable weighing machine. Height of body measured in centimeters. Subjects stood with their head, heels, and buttocks against a wall. Height was measured by an object placed on subject's head on a tape measure fixed to wall. BMI calculated as weight of body in kilogram divided by the body height in square meters (kg/m2).[8]

On the electrodes recesses the standard adhesive paste applied for better conduction. Electrodes adhered to mastoid surfaces. The headphone kept in position. Filter set at 100Hz–3000Hz.[9] Each ear stimulus was of short duration. Impedance kept low. BERA waves recorded at 80 dB and 2, 4, 6 KHz frequency. Two readings were recorded to confirm the reproducibility of BERA waves and interpeak latencies.

Statistical analysis

GRAPHPAD QUICKCALCS online student unpaired t test calculated the result. Mean and standard deviation of the parameters like BERA waves and interpeak latencies were compared between control and subclinical hypothyroid groups. The statistical significance was at P value < 0.05. Statistical highly significant was at P value < 0.001.


  Results Top


ABER waves were compared between control and subclinical hypothyroid group 2 subjects.

Mean waves I, III, V and inter-peak I-III, III-V, I-V latency of group 1 at 80 dB, 2 KHz reported 1.60 ± 0.20, 3.52 ± 0.15, 5.43 ± 0.17, 1.78 ± 0.23, 1.93 ± 0.23, 3.78 ± 0.34, and group 2 reported 1.62 ± 0.21, 3.65 ± 0.15, 5.60 ± 0.31, 2.00 ± 0.26, 2.04 ± 0.18, 3.98 ± 0.41(ms), respectively. Mean of subclinical hypothyroid group reported statistical significant (P value < 0.05) except wave I reported non-significance (P value > 0.05). Wave III and I-III interpeak reported high significance (P value < 0.001) [Table 1] and [Figure 1].
Table 1: Absolute latencies and inter peak latencies comparison in control group and subclinical hypothyroid group patients at 2 KHz and 80 dB

Click here to view
Figure 1: Graphs at 2, 4, 6 KHz and 80 dBs in subclinical hypothyroid and control group

Click here to view


Mean of wave I, III, V and inter-peak I-III, III-V, I-V latency of group 1 at 80 dB, 4 KHz reported 1.62 ± 0.21, 3.53 ± 0.17, 5.44 ± 0.25, 1.81 ± 0.17, 1.94 ± 0.28, 3.80 ± 0.38 while group 2 reported 1.71 ± 0.2, 3.66 ± 0.2, 5.71 ± 0.37, 2.01 ± 0.27, 2.07 ± 0.21, 4.07 ± 0.37 (ms), respectively. Mean reported statistical high significance (P value < 0.001) in subclinical group except wave I reported non-significance (P value > 0.05), wave III-V significant in subclinical (P value < 0.05) [Table 2] and [Figure 1].
Table 2: Absolute latencies and inter peak latencies comparison in control and subclinical hypothyroid group patients at 4 KHz and 80 dB

Click here to view


Mean of wave I, III, V and inter-peak I-III, III-V, I-V latency of group 1 at 80 dB, 6 KHz reported 1.62 ± 0.21, 3.54 ± 0.17, 5.45 ± 0.25, 1.82 ± 0.17, 1.96 ± 0.28, 3.81 ± 0.38 and group 2 reported 1.71 ± 0.2, 3.69 ± 0.2, 5.72 ± 0.37, 2.05 ± 0.27, 2.09 ± 0.21, 4.10 ± 0.37 (ms), respectively. Mean were statistically high significant (P value < 0.001) in subclinical group except wave I which was not significant (P-value > 0.05), wave III-V was significant (P value < 0.05) [Table 3] and [Figure 1].
Table 3: Relationship between auditory brainstem evoked potential in subclinical hypothyroid group at 80 dB and 6 KHz

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


ABER recorded and comparison done between subclinical hypothyroid and control group.

Wave I latency was reported non-significant. So, 8th nerve transmission till cochlear nucleus was normal. At 2 KHz, delay in absolute latency of wave III and wave V were highly significant and significant in subclinical hypothyroid group, respectively. Sangeeta et al. supported it.[10] Ozata et al. did not support it.[3] At 4 KHz delay in absolute latency of waves III and V and interpeak latency of wave I-III and I-V reported high significance, interpeak III-V reported significant delay in subclinical group. Cristiane et al. reported similar result.[2] At 6 KHz delay in absolute latency of waves III, V and interpeak latency I-III, III-V and I-V reported high significance (P <.001) in subclinical hypothyroid group. Cristiane et al. supported it.[2]

The percentage of subclinical hypothyroid subjects at 2 KHz, 4 KHz, and 6 KHz with delayed absolute latency of BERA waves III and V and all interpeak latency were 66.66% (20/30), 70% (21/30), and 80% (24/30), respectively. Increase in frequency of stimulus from 2 KHz, 4 KHz to 6 KHz led to recording of delayed BAEP easily. This is supported by Gupta V et al. In acquired hypothyroid patients, sensorineural hearing loss at higher frequency has been reported without affecting lower frequencies.[11] Significant delay in the absolute latency (AL) of BERA waves III, V, and interpeak latency has been found in subclinical hypothyroid group. It targets auditory pathway at brainstem and midbrain. At 6 KHz, highly significant BERA waves reported in subclinical hypothyroid as compared to control by chi square test [Table 4]. They had normal tuning fork tests and no hearing related complaint. So, subclinical involvement as well as severity can be detected early by BERA test at 6 KHz.
Table 4: Delayed auditory brainstem evoked potential in subclinical hypothyroid patients and control group at 6 KHz and 80 dB

Click here to view


The central nervous system (CNS) is deteriorated in subclinical hypothyroidism. Subclinical hypothyroidism leads to overt hypothyroidism.[10] The most important cause of hypothyroidism is autoimmunity.[12] Elevated levels of antibodies against thyroid peroxidase and thyroglobulin were reported in 60% subclinical hypothyroid subjects.[13] Pathophysiology in hypothyroidism may be degeneration of cochlear hair cells which deteriorates potentials of cochlea.[14] It affects protein synthesis, myelin production, and action of enzymes. T4 acts as a neurotransmitter in CNS.[15] Hypothyroidism leads to lipid peroxidation, which generates free radical and causes tissue damage.[16] Hashimoto's disease is the most common etiology of primary hypothyroidism where antibodies destroy thyroid gland or lymphocytes attack gland. Subjects with elevated serum TSH concentration with normal serum free thyroxine confirms hypothyroidism of subclinical type.[17]


  Conclusion Top


BERA investigation at higher frequency, i.e., 6 KHz and 80 dB detects central neuropathy earlier in patients of subclinical hypothyroid having no hearing complaint. Earlier detection of hearing pathway defect and intervention with thyroxine treatment may prevent disease progression and morbidity in subclinical hypothyroid patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

All the expenses borne by Principal Investigator Dr.Indira Jha.

Sponsorship - Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Anjana Y, Vaney N, Tandon OP, Madhu SV. Functional status of auditory pathways in hypothyroidism: Evoked potential study. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2006;50:341.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sharma K, Behera JK, Kumar N, Sood S, Madan HS, Das S. Brainstem evoked potential in newly diagnosed patients of subclinical hypothyroidism. N Am J Med Sci 2015;7:131-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ozata M, Ozkardes A, Corakci A, Gundogan MA. Subclinical hypothyroidism does not lead to alterations either in peripheral nerves or in brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs). Thyroid 1995;5:201-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Singh R, Aftab M, Jain S, Kumar D. Audiological evaluation in hypothyroid patients and effect of thyroxine replacement therapy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;71(Suppl 1):548-52.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sheehan MT. Biochemical testing of the thyroid: TSH is the best and, oftentimes, only test needed-A review for primary care. Clin Med Res 2016;14:83-92.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sushil MI, Muneshwar JN, Afroz S. To study brain stem auditory evoked potential in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus- A cross- sectional comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:CC01-CC04.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol 2013;4:863.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Sushil MI, Muneshwar JN, Khan ST. To study body mass index, waist circumference, waist hip ratio, body adiposity index and lipid profile level in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2015;14:98-101.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Mishra IS, Shingne R, Roy NK. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients at varying frequencies. Ann Afr Med 2023;22:107-111.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
10.
Gupta S, Kaiti R, Gupta G. Evaluation of the female patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:CC13-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Gupta V, Dogra SS, Bansal P, Thakur K. Hearing impairment in patients of hypothyroidism in sub-Himalayan region. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;6:1494-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Biondi B, Cappola AR, Cooper DS. Subclinical hypothyroidism: A review. JAMA 2019;322:153-60.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Shimizu Y, Kawashiri SY, Noguchi Y, Nagata Y, Maeda T, Hayashida N. Anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody and subclinical hypothyroidism in relation to hypertension and thyroid cysts. PLoS One 2020;15:e0240198.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Sharlin DS, Ng L, Verrey F, Visser TJ, Liu Y, Olszewski RT, et al. Deafness and loss of cochlear hair cells in the absence of thyroid hormone transporters Slc16a2 (Mct8) and Slc16a10 (Mct10). Sci Rep 2018;8:4403.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Głombik K, Detka J, Budziszewska B. Hormonal regulation of oxidative phosphorylation in the brain in health and disease. Cells 2021;10:2937.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Chakrabarti SK, Ghosh S, Banerjee S, Mukherjee S, Chowdhury S. Oxidative stress in hypothyroid patients and the role of antioxidant supplementation. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2016;20:674-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Biondi B, Cappola AR. Subclinical hypothyroidism in older individuals. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2022;10:129-41.  Back to cited text no. 17
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Material and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed328    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded54    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal