Users Online: 4537
Home Print this page Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Ahead of Print Instructions Subscribe Contacts Special issues Login 


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Adv Biomed Res 2023,  12:94

Effects of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of gentamicin on alginate produced by clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa


Molecular Microbiology Research Center (MMRC), Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

Date of Submission14-Dec-2021
Date of Acceptance22-Oct-2022
Date of Web Publication25-Apr-2023

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Parviz Owlia
Molecular Microbiology Research Center (MMRC). Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_389_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Bacterial virulence factors may be influenced by sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (sub-MICs) of antibiotics. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of gentamicin at sub-MICs (0.5 MIC and 0.25 MIC) on alginate production of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Materials and Methods: The minimum inhibitory concentrations of gentamicin against 88 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were determined using the broth microdilution method. Alginate production of the isolates in the absence and presence of gentamicin at sub-MICs was assessed by the carbazole method. The presence of alginate in clinical isolates was confirmed by the detection of alginate genes (algD and algU) using the PCR method.
Results: All the isolates had the ability of alginate production and were positive for algD and algU genes. sub-MICs of gentamicin significantly increased alginate production of 34 isolates (38.6%). On the other hand, in 49 isolates (55.7%), alginate production was significantly increased after treatment with sub-MICs of gentamicin. In five isolates (5.7%), the alginate production was reduced in exposure to 0.5 MIC of gentamicin while it was increased by gentamicin at 0.25 MIC.
Conclusion: This study showed different effects of gentamicin at sub-MICs on the alginate production of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. Further research is highly recommended to understand the mechanism of different responses of P. aeruginosa isolates to the exposure of sub-MICs of gentamicin.

Keywords: Alginates, gentamicins, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, virulence factors


How to cite this article:
Saidi N, Davarzani F, Yousefpour Z, Owlia P. Effects of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of gentamicin on alginate produced by clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Adv Biomed Res 2023;12:94

How to cite this URL:
Saidi N, Davarzani F, Yousefpour Z, Owlia P. Effects of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of gentamicin on alginate produced by clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 7];12:94. Available from: https://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2023/12/1/94/374533




  Introduction Top


Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a human opportunistic pathogen that causes different infections including respiratory infections, urinary tract infections, wound infections, burn infections, and septicemia in patients with primary and acquired immunodeficiency, particularly cystic fibrosis patients.[1],[2] Increasing the number of infections caused by P. aeruginosa is one of the world's health concerns because of its intrinsic resistance to many antibiotics and also the ability to acquire and develop resistance during treatment.[3] P. aeruginosa produces several virulence factors and toxins that are involved in the invasion and toxicity of this bacterium.[4] Alginate is the main virulence factor of P. aeruginosa mucoid strains associated with the development of the chronic phase of infections, especially respiratory chronic infections in patients with cystic fibrosis.[5],[6] Alginate, an extracellular polysaccharide, is composed of β-d-mannuronic acid and α-l-guluronic acid monomers, which are linked by β1 → 4 glycosidic linkages.[7] algD and algU genes are among the main genes responsible for alginate biosynthesis.[8] Alginate forms a polyanionic barrier protecting bacteria against the host immune system and penetration of certain antibiotics.[9],[10] According to the results of some reports, alginate increases the resistance of P. aeruginosa to specific antibiotics.[11] In P. aeruginosa mucoid strains, alginate is the major exopolysaccharide of biofilm structure and is involved in the formation of differentiated biofilms (thick three-dimensional), which are highly resistant to antibiotic treatment.[12] Any process leading to changes in the alginate production level affects the pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa.

Antibiotics are the main agents to treat bacterial infections, which should be prescribed at supra-inhibitory concentrations and for successive doses. However, in vivo, the administered concentrations of antibiotics may become sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (sub-MICs) after a specific period following a dose.[13] It has been demonstrated that antibiotics even at their sub-MICs can affect bacterial pathogenesis through different mechanisms such as altering virulence factors of bacteria.[14] The kind of these effects depends on various factors and is a controversial subject. sub-MICs of antibiotics have been reported to induce change in the level of bacterial virulence gene expression, which lead to different phenotypes. Also, it has been shown that antibiotics at sub-MICs can be directly responsible for emerging of new antibiotic resistance by elevating mutation rate and spreading of mutation through horizontal gene transfer.[15] There are several studies indicating that P. aeruginosa virulence factors are influenced by sub-MICs of antibiotics.[16] The principal objective of this research was to determine the effects of gentamicin at sub-MICs (0.5 MIC and 0.25 MIC) on the alginate production of different clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa.


  Materials and Methods Top


Bacterial isolates

Eighty-eight clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were selected for this study. The isolates were isolated from different clinical specimens (blood, urine, sputum, wound, and tracheal) in selected hospitals in Tehran between 2017 and 2018. Standard microbiological tests were performed to identify the P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. These tests included colony morphology, Gram staining, culture on TSI medium, catalase test, oxidase test, oxidation-fermentation test (OF), and growth at 42°C. Also, two P. aeruginosa standard strains were served in this study includin: P. aeruginosa ATCC27853 for quality control in MIC determination test and P. aeruginosa 8821 M as a positive control for alginate production assay. The bacteria were stored at −70°C in nutrient broth (Merck, Germany) containing 20% glycerol. This project was approved by the research ethics committee of Shahed University with approval ID IR.SHAHED.REC.1398.73.

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of gentamicin

Determination of MIC values of gentamicin (Bio Basic Canada-INC) against clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and standard strain 8821M was done using the broth microdilution method based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) protocols.[17] At first, a stock solution of gentamicin with a final concentration of 5120 μg/mL was prepared. Then, the dual consecutive concentrations of gentamicin (2048 -0. 25 μg/mL) were prepared from the stock solution by diluting it with Mueller–Hinton Broth (MHB) medium (Merck, Germany). Each of the gentamicin concentrations was shifted to wells of a microplate, and inoculated with bacterial suspension with a concentration of 1 × 106 CFU/mL. For each isolate, a positive control (antibiotic-free culture) and negative control (bacterial-free culture) were considered, separately. The microplate was placed at 37°C for 24 h. The lowest level of gentamicin without seeable turbidity was reported as MIC. To determine the resistance pattern of the isolates to gentamicin, the MIC results were interpreted according to the CLSI guideline (MIC ≤4 μg/mL: sensitive, MIC ≥16 μg/mL: resistant).

Effect of sub-MICs of gentamicin on the alginate production

Evaluation of alginate production of bacteria treated and untreated with sub-MICs of gentamicin (0.5 MIC and 0.25 MIC) was performed using Carbazole assay according to previous study.[18] At first, P. aeruginosa isolate was cultured on the nutrient agar medium (Merck, Germany) overnight at 37°C. Then, from this culture, 1 × 108 CFU/mL of the bacteria were added to the MHB medium and MHB mediums containing sub-MICs of gentamicin and then were incubated in an incubator shaker at 37°C. MHB was used as a negative control. After 24 h, 140 μL of each culture was mixed with 1200 μL of borate-sulfuric acid solution, which had been placed in an ice bath. The mixture was vortexed and was returned to the ice bath, and then 40 μL of 0.2% carbazole solution was added to it. After vortexing, the mixture was incubated at 55°C for 30 min, and then optical density (OD) was read at 540 nm by a spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, USA). All the steps were run in triplicate.

Standard curve of alginate

Alginate standard curve was plotted to express the concentration of alginate produced by P. aeruginosa clinical isolates as micrograms per microliter. At first, 1 mg of alginic acid (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was dissolved in 10 mL distilled water to prepare an alginate stock solution with a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The stock solution was diluted in distilled water and 16 dilutions were prepared with the range of 20–320 μg/mL. Carbazole assay was performed for all the dilutions. The OD values of alginate standard solutions were placed against their corresponding concentrations on a graph and the standard curve was plotted.

Molecular detection of alginate genes

The presence of alginate in P. aeruginosa clinical isolates was confirmed by the detection of important genes involved in the biosynthesis of alginate (algD and algU) using the PCR method. [Table 1] shows the sequences of used primers. Specific primers for algD gene were designed by AlellID6 software. Based on the extracted sequences of this gene from the Gen Bank NCBI database. The sequences of primers used for the algU gene were according to the previous study.[19] P. aeruginosa 8821M was used as a positive control. The total volume of PCR reaction was 25 μL. The components of each PCR reaction included: 12.5 μL of Taq DNA Polymerase Master Mix (Ampliqon, Denmark), 0.5 μL of each primer, 6.5 μL of ddH2O, and 5 μL of Template DNA. The boiling method was used for the extraction of DNA from studied isolates. Amplification of the genes was performed in thermocycler instrument (Bio-Rad, USA) as follows: Initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min and 34 cycles included denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 59°C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min and at the end, final extension at 72°C for 10 min. For separation of PCR products, electrophoresis was carried out on a 2% agarose gel which had been stained with a safe stain (Sinacolon, Iran).
Table 1: Sequences of primers used for molecular detection of algD and algU genes


Click here to view


Statistical analysis

Alginate production assay was performed in triplicate and obtained results were analyzed with GraphPad Prism software version 8.0.2. Results were reported as the means ± standard deviation (SD). Determination of the statistical significance of differences between gentamicin-treated bacteria and control bacteria (untreated) was performed using the one-way ANOVA test. Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between the studied factors. P values less than 0.05 were considered as the significance level.


  Results Top


MIC results

The MICs of gentamicin against P. aeruginosa isolates, which were obtained by broth microdilution method, were interpreted based on CLSI protocols. Sixty-two isolates (70%) were susceptible to gentamicin and MIC values were between 0.25 and 2 μg/mL. The range of MIC values in 26 clinical isolates (30%) was between 16 and 512 μg/mL and therefore were considered as resistant isolates [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Frequency of MICs of gentamicin against P. aeruginosa isolates

Click here to view


Standard curve of alginate

Standard curve of alginate was made by plotting the concentrations of alginate standard solutions on the X-axis and their OD values on the Y-axis. This graph was linear which indicated that the OD of each solution was proportional to its concentration [Figure 2]. Therefore, this curve was used to obtain the concentration of alginate produced by P. aeruginosa clinical isolates.
Figure 2: Standard curve of alginate

Click here to view


Effects of sub-MICs of gentamicin on alginate production

The amount of alginate produced by bacteria untreated and treated with sub-MICs of gentamicin (0.5 MIC and 0.25 MIC) was measured. The ability of alginate production was observed in all the studied P. aeruginosa isolates. The concentration of alginate among these isolates was in the range of 4–312 μg/mL. The level of alginate production of the isolates in exposure to 0.5 MIC of gentamicin was between 0 and 349 μg/mL and in exposure to 0.25 MIC of gentamicin was in the range of 6–343 μg/mL. P. aeruginosa clinical isolates showed different responses to the exposure of sub-MICs of gentamicin. In 34 clinical isolates (38.6%) and P. aeruginosa 8821 M, alginate production was significantly reduced after treatment with sub-MICs of gentamicin (P < 0.001). This inhibitory effect was concentration-dependent and 0.5 MIC of gentamicin had a more inhibitory effect on alginate production relative to 0.25 MIC of gentamicin. On the other hand, sub-MICs of gentamicin could significantly increase the alginate production of 49 clinical isolates (55.7%) (P < 0.001). In these isolates, 0.25 MIC of gentamicin had a more stimulatory effect on alginate production. In five clinical isolates (5.7%), the alginate production was decreased in exposure to 0.5 MIC of gentamicin while it was increased by 0.25 MIC of gentamicin [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Effects of sub-MICs of gentamicin on alginate production of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. (A) stimulatory effect, (B) inhibitory effect, (C) inhibitory effect at 0.5 MIC and stimulatory effect at 0.25 MIC concentration of gentamicin. The graph indicates average concentration of alginate produced by clinical isolates

Click here to view


In all the studied isolates, we did not find any significant correlation between the amount of alginate production and the type of its change after treatment sub-MICs of gentamicin (P > 0.05).

Also, there was not any significant relationship between the alginate production change of each isolate and resistance pattern to gentamicin (P > 0.05).

Molecular detection of alginate genes

Alginate coding genes (algD and algU) were identified using the PCR method to confirm the presence of alginate in clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. algD and algU genes were detected in all the studied isolates, so the frequency of these genes was reported 100% [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Electrophoresis of PCR products of algU (292bp) and algD (164bp) genes. L: 1Kb Ladder, P1-P13: clinical isolates, S: Positive control (P. aeruginosa 8821 M)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an invasive opportunistic organism responsible for different types of acute and chronic infections in patients with immunodeficiency disorders.[4] One of the effective mechanisms involved in the survival of P. aeruginosa in the lungs of patients with respiratory infections is the overproduction of an exopolysaccharide called alginate by this bacterium. Alginate production has been shown to be associated with the pathogenicity of chronic infections of P. aeruginosa, which causes a significant increase in morbidity and mortality.[20],[21] Thus, the inhibition of alginate production is essential to control and prevent infections caused by P. aeruginosa mucoid strains.

In the course of antibiotic therapy, bacteria may be encountered by sub-MICs of antibiotics due to several reasons including restricted drug accessibility, prophylactic treatments with low doses of antibiotics, incomplete antibiotic treatment, etc.[15] It has been demonstrated that the production of bacterial virulence factors may be influenced by antibiotics at sub-MICs. Antibiotics at sub-MICs have been demonstrated to have both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on bacteria such as P. aeruginosa.[16] The present study was accomplished to examine the effects of gentamicin at sub-MICs (0.5 MIC and 0.25 MIC) on the alginate production of 88 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. All the studied isolates were observed to be alginate producers and the frequency of alginate coding genes (algD and algU) among these isolates was 100%. Some other studies have been carried out on the frequency of alginate production and alginate coding genes among P. aeruginosa isolates. For instance, in a study conducted by Ghadaksaz et al.[19] on 104 clinical isolates, 89.4% of the isolates could produce alginate, and the prevalence of algD and algU genes was 87.5% and 90.4%, respectively. In a study, Pournajaf et al.[22] reported that among 143 isolates of P. aeruginosa, 88.8% of the isolates were alginate producers, and 92.3% and 86.7% of the isolates were positive for algD and algU genes, respectively.

In the present study, treatment of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa with sub-MICs of gentamicin resulted in different changes in the alginate level of the studied isolates. Gentamicin at sub-MICs significantly decreased the alginate level by 38/6% of the isolates. The inhibitory effect of antibiotics at sub-MICs has been reported in some studies. In a study, Khan et al.[23] revealed that aminoglycoside antibiotics (gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, etc) could inhibit biofilm formation, bacterial motility, the production of LasA protease enzymes, pyocyanin, and pyoverdine in P. aeruginosa PAO1. In a study conducted by Srivastava et al.[24] sub-MICs of meropenem and ciprofloxacin reduced biofilm formation in two extensive drug-resistant (XDR) isolates of P. aeruginosa isolated from diabetic foot ulcers.

On the other hand, a significant increase was observed in the amount of alginate production of 55.7% of the isolates in exposure to sub-MICs of gentamicin. These results are in agreement with some studies in which the stimulatory effect of antibiotics at sub-MICs on bacteria has been shown. In a study by Hagras et al.[25] sub-MICs of cefepime increased the expression of biofilm-associated genes and subsequently biofilm formation in six clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. Linares et al.,[26] examined the effects of some antibiotics classes at sub-MICs on some factors of P. aeruginosa PAO1. In their study, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline induced biofilm formation, tobramycin increased swarming and swimming motility, and tetracycline increased genes expression of type III secretion system and subsequently bacterial cytotoxicity.

In the current study, in 5.7% of the clinical isolates, the effect of 0.5 MIC of gentamicin on alginate production differed from the effect of 0.25 MIC of gentamicin. In these isolates, alginate production was inhibited following exposure to 0.5 MIC of gentamicin while it was stimulated by 0.25 MIC of gentamicin. Similar to these results, Navidifar et al.[27] showed that biofilm formation of an Acinetobacter baumannii clinical strain was inhibited by meropenem at 0.5 MIC while it was induced at 0.125 MIC of meropenem.

In the present study, gentamicin at sub-MICs showed different effects on the alginate production of studied clinical isolates. In consistent with these results, Yousefpour et al.[28] showed different effects of sub-MICs of gentamicin (0.5 MIC and 0.25 MIC) on biofilm formation of 100 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. In their study, gentamicin at sub-MICs reduced the capacity to form biofilm in 31% of isolates, whereas increased it in 46% of isolates. Also, in 3% of clinical isolate, gentamicin at 0.5 MIC resulted in a significant decrease in biofilm formation while at 0.25 MIC significantly increased biofilm formation. The mechanisms in charge of different responses of distinct P. aeruginosa isolates to the exposure sub-MICs of gentamicin are not explicit to the authors of the current study. Some research ascribed the mechanisms involved in bacterial phenotypic changes caused by sub-MICs of antibiotics to the changes in the expression level of virulence genes. For example, Bagge et al.[29] indicated that changes in the expression level of alginate-related genes (algD and algU) in the presence of sub-MICs of imipenem resulted in a change in the alginate level and the capacity of biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa PAO1. There is a hypothesis saying that antibiotics at sub-MICs can be as signaling molecules and the expression of virulence-related genes seems to be regulated and modulated by sub-MICs of antibiotics.[14] On the other hand, since the virulence gene expression and production of virulence factors are controlled by the quorum-sensing (QS) system, some studies have reported that expression changes of virulence-related genes in bacteria treated with sub-MICs of antibiotics, which subsequently affect the production of virulence factors, are due to the effects of these concentrations on QS signal molecules and QS-related genes. For example, Roudashti et al.[30] reported that curcumin, ceftazidime, and ciprofloxacin at sub-MICs inhibited motility and biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa PAO1 by repressing the expression of QS-related genes and QS signal molecules. Thus, further studies are required to evaluate whether or not sub-MICs of gentamicin affect the QS system and also the expression level of genes involved in alginate production.

In this study, the effects of sub-MICs of gentamicin on different clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa included both stimulatory and inhibitory effects. It is speculated that bacterial responses following exposure to sub-MICs of antibiotics are dependent on the isolates and strains type and also the type of used antibiotics. Overproduction of alginate caused by sub-MICs of gentamicin can lead to the persistence of bacteria in chronic infections and subsequently antimicrobial resistance may be developed. According to the probable unfavorable effects of antibiotics at sub-MICs on some bacterial isolates, it is suggested that antibiotics should be consumed in an appropriate dosage to avoid bacterial exposure to sub-MIC levels of antibiotics. The results reported in this study are in vitro data. In vivo, the pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa is affected by a number of different factors including host cells, presence of other bacteria, availability of different nutrients, other stresses, etc. Thus, in vivo studies such as animal tests should be conducted to confirm the effect of sub-MICs of gentamicin on bacterial pathogenesis. In addition, performing further studies are needed to determine molecular mechanisms responsible for changes in bacterial virulence factors at sub-MICs of antibiotics. Discovering and developing therapeutic agents which target the main molecular factors involved in bacterial responses to sub-MICs of antibiotics, can increase the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy.


  Conclusion Top


The present study indicated that the different responses of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa to the presence of sub-MICs of gentamicin resulted in different changes in alginate levels. Further research should be carried out to determine the mechanisms involved in these responses and discover new treatment strategies based on these mechanisms for the prevention and treatment of P. aeruginosa infections.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was granted by Shahed University, Tehran-Iran.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Skariyachan S, Sridhar VS, Packirisamy S, Kumargowda ST, Challapilli SB. Recent perspectives on the molecular basis of biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and approaches for treatment and biofilm dispersal. Folia Microbiol 2018;63:413-32.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ghadam P, Akhlaghi F, Ali AA. One-step purification and characterization of alginate lyase from a clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa with destructive activity on bacterial biofilm. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2017;20:467-73.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kaszab E, Radó J, Kriszt B, Pászti J, Lesinszki V, Szabó A, et al. Groundwater, soil and compost, as possible sources of virulent and antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Environ Health Res 2021;31:848-60.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Tuon FF, Dantas LR, Suss PH, Tasca Ribeiro VS. Pathogenesis of the pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm: A review. Pathogens 2022;11:300.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Otani S, Hiramatsu K, Hashinaga K, Komiya K, Umeki K, Kishi K, et al. Sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of ceftazidime inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. J Infect Chemother 2018;24:428-33.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Hao M, Ma W, Dong X, Li X, Cheng F, Wang Y. Comparative genome analysis of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa JNQH-PA57, a clinically isolated mucoid strain with comprehensive carbapenem resistance mechanisms. BMC Microbiol 2021;21:133.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kamali E, Jamali A, Ardebili A. Evaluation of antimicrobial resistance, biofilm forming potential, and the presence of biofilm-related genes among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Res Notes 2020;13:27.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ellappan K, Belgode Narasimha H, Kumar S. Coexistence of multidrug resistance mechanisms and virulence genes in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from a tertiary care hospital in South India. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2018;12:37-43.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bieber Urbauer RJ, Gilmore JM, Rosasco SE, Hattle JM, Cowley AB, Urbauer JL. Cloning, high yield overexpression, purification, and characterization of AlgH, a regulator of alginate biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Protein Expr Purif G2005;43:57-64.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Moradali MF, Donati I, Sims IM, Ghods S, Rehm BH. Alginate polymerization and modification are linked in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. M Bio 2015;6:e00453-15.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Heidari R, Farajzadeh Sheikh A, Hashemzadeh M, Farshadzadeh Z, Salmanzadeh S, Saki M. Antibiotic resistance, biofilm production ability and genetic diversity of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from nosocomial infections in southwestern Iran. Mol Biol Rep 2022;49:3811-22.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Jacobs HM, O'Neal L, Lopatto E, Wozniak DJ, Bjarnsholt T, Parsek MR. Mucoid pseudomonas aeruginosa can produce calcium-gelled biofilms independent of the matrix components Psl and CdrA. J Bacteriol 2022;204:e0056821.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Sato Y, Unno Y, Ubagai T, Ono Y. Sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of colistin and polymyxin B promote Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm formation. PloS One 2018;13:e0194556.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Shen L, Shi Y, Zhang D, Wei J, Surette MG, Duan K. Modulation of secreted virulence factor genes by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Microbiol 2008;46:441-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Sanz-García F, Hernando-Amado S, Martínez JL. Evolution under low antibiotic concentrations: A risk for the selection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa multidrug-resistant mutants in nature. Environ Microbiol 2022;24:1279-93.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bruchmann J, Kirchen S, Schwartz T. Sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics and wastewater influencing biofilm formation and gene expression of multi-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa wastewater isolates. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2013;20:3539-43.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Clinical and laboratory standard institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 27th ed (M100-S30). Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2020.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Davarzani F, Saidi N, Besharati S, Saderi H, Rasooli I, Owlia P. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance pattern, alginate and biofilm production in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Iran J Public Health 2021;50:341-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ghadaksaz A, Imani Fooladi AA, Mahmoodzadeh Hosseini H, Amin M. The prevalence of some Pseudomonas virulence genes related to biofilm formation and alginate production among clinical isolates. J Appl Biomed 2015;13:61-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Powell LC, Pritchard MF, Ferguson EL, Powell KA, Patel SU, Rye PD, et al. Targeted disruption of the extracellular polymeric network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by alginate oligosaccharides. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2018;4:13.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Delgado C, Florez L, Lollett I, Lopez C, Kangeyan S, Kumari H, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa regulated intramembrane proteolysis: Protease MucP can overcome mutations in the AlgO periplasmic protease to restore alginate production in nonmucoid revertants. J Bacteriol 2018;200:e00215-18.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Pournajaf A, Razavi S, Irajian G, Ardebili A, Erfani Y, Solgi S, et al. Integron types, antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence gene profile, alginate production and biofilm formation in Iranian cystic fibrosis Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Infez Med 2018;26:226-36.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Khan F, Lee JW, Javaid A, Park SK, Kim YM. Inhibition of biofilm and virulence properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by sub-inhibitory concentrations of aminoglycosides. Microb Pathog 2020;146:104249.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Srivastava P, Sivashanmugam K. Efficacy of sub-MIC level of meropenem and ciprofloxacin against extensive drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates of diabetic foot ulcer patients. Infect Genet Evol 2021;92:104824.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Hagras SAA, Hosny AEMS, Helmy OM, Salem-Bekhit MM, Shakeel F, Farrag HA. Effect of sub-inhibitory concentrations of cefepime on biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Can J Microbiol 2021;67:894-901.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Linares JF, Gustafsson I, Baquero F, Martinez JL. Antibiotics as intermicrobial signaling agents instead of weapons. PNAS 2006;103:19484-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Navidifar T, Amin M, Rashno M. Effects of sub-inhibitory concentrations of meropenem and tigecycline on the expression of genes regulating pili, efflux pumps and virulence factors involved in biofilm formation by Acinetobacter baumannii. Infect Drug Resist 2019;12:1099-111.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Yousefpour Z, Davarzani F, Owlia P. Evaluating of the effects of sub-MIC concentrations of gentamicin on biofilm formation in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Iran J Pathol 2021;16:403-10.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Bagge N, Schuster M, Hentzer M, Ciofu O, Givskov M, Greenberg EP, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms exposed to imipenem exhibit changes in global gene expression and β-lactamase and alginate production. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:1175-87.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Roudashti S, Zeighami H, Mirshahabi H, Bahari S, Soltani A, Haghi F. Synergistic activity of sub-inhibitory concentrations of curcumin with ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing related genes and virulence traits. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2017;33:50.  Back to cited text no. 30
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed208    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal