Users Online: 11025
Home
About us
Editorial board
Search
Browse articles
Submit article
Ahead of Print
Instructions
Subscribe
Contacts
Special issues
Login
» Articles published in the past year
To view other articles click corresponding year from the navigation links on the side bar.
All
|
Brief Communication
|
Brief Reports
|
Case Report and Literature Review
|
Case Reports
|
Commentary
|
Editorial
|
Erratum
|
Letter to Editor
|
Letters to Editor
|
Meta Analysis
|
Notice of Retraction
|
Original Article
|
Original Articles
|
Original Empirical Article
|
Research Articles
|
Review Articles
|
Review Report
|
Short Communications
|
Systematic Review
|
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
Show all abstracts
Show selected abstracts
Export selected to
Add to my list
Brief Report:
Early Versus Delayed (Traditional) Postoperative Oral Feeding in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Anastomosis
Behzad Nematihonar, Sohrab Salimi, Vahid Noorian, Majid Samsami
Adv Biomed Res
2018, 7:30 (16 February 2018)
DOI
:10.4103/abr.abr_290_16
PMID
:29531928
Background:
A period of starvation after colorectal anastomosis to permit for resolution of the clinical evidence of ileus has been an unchallenged surgical dogma until recent years. We intended to determine the safety and feasibility of an unconventional postoperative oral intake protocol in patients experiencing colorectal anastomosis.
Materials and Methods:
Between 2013 and 2015, sixty consecutive patients underwent colorectal anastomosis and they were randomized into two groups. The early feeding group began fluids on the first postoperative day while the regular feeding group was managed in the traditional way - nothing by mouth until the complete resolution of ileus.
Results:
The majority of patients (93%) tolerated the early feeding. The times to first passage of flatus (2.66 ± 0.71 days vs. 3.9 ± 0.071 days) and stool (3.9 ± 0.92 days vs. 5.4 ± 0.77 days) were significantly quicker in early feeding group. Hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the early feeding group (4 ± 0.64 days vs. 6.1 ± 0.84 days). Anastomosis leakage and abscess formation were not seen in early feeding group. The patient's satisfaction (visual analog scale) in the early feeding group was higher than delayed feeding group (8.56 ± 1.16 vs. 7.06 ± 1.59,
P
< 0.001).
Conclusions:
Early oral feeding after colorectal surgeries is safe and tolerated by the majority of patients.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (12) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Feedback
Subscribe
Advanced Search
Month wise articles
Figures next to the month indicate the number of articles in that month
2023
April
[
1
]
January
[
1
]
2022
September
[
1
]
February
[
2
]
2021
November
[
1
]
February
[
1
]
2019
March
[
1
]
February
[
1
]
January
[
1
]
2018
February
[
1
]
2017
December
[
1
]
November
[
3
]
October
[
2
]
July
[
1
]
May
[
1
]
April
[
2
]
March
[
1
]
January
[
1
]
2016
December
[
3
]
July
[
1
]
May
[
2
]
April
[
1
]
March
[
4
]
2015
August
[
4
]
July
[
1
]
June
[
1
]
March
[
1
]
February
[
2
]
January
[
1
]
2014
December
[
3
]
September
[
1
]
May
[
1
]
January
[
2
]
2013
October
[
1
]
2012
October
[
1
]
Sitemap
|
What's New
Feedback
|
Copyright and Disclaimer
|
Privacy Notice
© Advanced Biomedical Research | Published by Wolters Kluwer -
Medknow
Online since 15 January, 2012