Users Online: 4015
Home
About us
Editorial board
Search
Browse articles
Submit article
Ahead of Print
Instructions
Subscribe
Contacts
Special issues
Login
» Articles published in the past year
To view other articles click corresponding year from the navigation links on the side bar.
All
|
Brief Communication
|
Brief Reports
|
Case Report and Literature Review
|
Case Reports
|
Commentary
|
Editorial
|
Erratum
|
Letter to Editor
|
Letters to Editor
|
Meta Analysis
|
Notice of Retraction
|
Original Article
|
Original Articles
|
Original Empirical Article
|
Research Articles
|
Review Articles
|
Review Report
|
Short Communications
|
Systematic Review
|
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
Show all abstracts
Show selected abstracts
Export selected to
Add to my list
Brief Report:
Effect of Incise Drape on Contamination Rate of Surgical Wound during Surgical Procedures of Lumbar Spine
Mohammadreza Zarei, Homayoun Tabesh, Hossein Fazeli, Akram Aarabi
Adv Biomed Res
2019, 8:8 (31 January 2019)
DOI
:10.4103/2277-9175.251213
PMID
:30820429
Background:
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the incise drape (ID) on surgical wound bacterial contamination during lumbar spine surgical procedures in treatment group (with ID) and control group (without ID).
Materials and Methods:
The present study was conducted on 88 patients who were a candidate for lumbar spine surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups, treatment and control. The ID was only used in the treatment group. The surgical wound sampling for bacterial culture was done in two steps, immediately after surgical incision (IASI) and immediately prior to the surgical wound closure (IPSWC). The samples were then sent to the laboratory.
Results:
The mean total bacterial count of the surgical wound in the stage IASI was not significantly different between treatment and control groups (0.09 vs. 0.02,
P
= 0.31). However, this means in the stage IPSWC in treatment group was significantly more than the control group (18.6 vs. 0.41,
P
= 0.04). The frequency distribution of
Staphylococcus aureus
(25% vs. 3%,
P
= 0.02) and
Staphylococcus epidermidis
(36.4% vs. 9.1%,
P
= 0.002) was significantly higher in the treatment group compared with control group in the stage IPSWC.
Conclusion:
The results suggest that the use of ID is unable to reduce surgical wound bacterial contamination in clean lumbar spine surgery. Therefore, based on the results obtained in our study, the application of ID is not recommended as an essential action for the prevention of surgical wound contamination.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Feedback
Subscribe
Advanced Search
Month wise articles
Figures next to the month indicate the number of articles in that month
2023
April
[
1
]
January
[
1
]
2022
September
[
1
]
February
[
2
]
2021
November
[
1
]
February
[
1
]
2019
March
[
1
]
February
[
1
]
January
[
1
]
2018
February
[
1
]
2017
December
[
1
]
November
[
3
]
October
[
2
]
July
[
1
]
May
[
1
]
April
[
2
]
March
[
1
]
January
[
1
]
2016
December
[
3
]
July
[
1
]
May
[
2
]
April
[
1
]
March
[
4
]
2015
August
[
4
]
July
[
1
]
June
[
1
]
March
[
1
]
February
[
2
]
January
[
1
]
2014
December
[
3
]
September
[
1
]
May
[
1
]
January
[
2
]
2013
October
[
1
]
2012
October
[
1
]
Sitemap
|
What's New
Feedback
|
Copyright and Disclaimer
|
Privacy Notice
© Advanced Biomedical Research | Published by Wolters Kluwer -
Medknow
Online since 15 January, 2012